Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27008256›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB

Impact of micronutrients supplementation on bone repair around implants: microCT and counter-torque analysis in rats.

Suzana Peres Pimentel, Renato Correa Casarin, Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro, Fabiano Ribeiro Cirano, Karla Rovaris, Francisco Haiter Neto, Marcio Zaffalon Casati

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Post-Bariatric Patients: An Underestimated Risk in Oral Surgery? Clinical Implications and Perspectives.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzana Peres PimentelFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Renato Correa CasarinFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fernanda Vieira RibeiroFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Fabiano Ribeiro CiranoFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Karla RovarisDepartamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil.
Francisco Haiter NetoDepartamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brasil.
Marcio Zaffalon CasatiFaculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Paulista, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Universidade Paulista · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe use of natural substances and micronutritional approaches has been suggested as a therapeutic alternative to benefit the bone healing associated with no side effects. Nevertheless, the influence of micronutritional interventions with therapeutic proprieties on the bone repair has yet to be intensely evaluated, and no evidence is available exploring the impact of micronutrient supplementation on the peri-implant bone healing.

objectiveThis study investigated the effect of micronutrients supplementation on the bone repair around implants. MATERIAL AND

methodsOne screw-shaped titanium implant was inserted in each tibia of each rat, which were assigned to: daily administration, for 30 d, of the placebo solution (Placebo group-n:18) or micronutrients supplementation (Micronutrients group-n:18), based on calcium, magnesium, zinc, and vitamin D3 intake. After, the animals were sacrificed. One of the implants was removed by applying a counter-torque force to evaluate the force to rupture the bone-implant interface. The other implant was evaluated by microcomputed tomography (CT) examination to determine the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and the bone volume (BV/TV).

resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for both counter-torque values and microCT parameters (p>0.05).

conclusionWithin the limits of this study, micronutrients supplementation did not provide additional benefits to the bone healing around dental implants.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimalsBone-Implant InterfaceBone RegenerationBone ScrewsCalciumCholecalciferolDental Implantation, EndosseousFracture HealingMagnesiumMaleMicronutrientsPlacebo EffectRats, WistarTibiaTitaniumCalciumCholecalciferolMagnesiumMicronutrientsTitaniumZinc

Identifiers

PMID27008256
PMCPMC4775009
OpenAlexW2307135795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.