Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27007985›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2016

Fetal Deaths in Brazil: Historical Series Descriptive Analysis 1996-2012.

Maria Salete Medeiros Vieira, Filipe Medeiros Vieira, Tânia Silvia Fröde, Eleonora d'Orsi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perinatal Mortality Analysis in Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2008 to 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Salete Medeiros VieiraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Santa Catarina, University Campus, s/nº, Trindade, Mailbox: 5199, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-900, Brazil. msaletemv@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1985-8512
Filipe Medeiros VieiraFederal University of Santa Catarina, University Campus, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Tânia Silvia FrödeDepartment of Clinical Analysis, Center of Health Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, University Campus, Trindade, Mailbox: 476, Florianópolis, SC, 88040900, Brazil.
Eleonora d'OrsiPublic Health Department, Center of Health Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, University Campus, Trindade, Mailbox: 476, Florianópolis, SC, 88040900, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRConcordia University Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective We seek to comprehensively assess stillbirths in Brazil, to compare the Brazilian findings with global trends and to identify the limitations of the fetal death record system. Method We studied fetal deaths in Brazil between 1996 and 2012 within the following five regions of the country: the North, Northeast, Southeast, South, and Central-West, through an analysis of data obtained from the Unified Health System's (SUS) Informatics Department. The rates of stillbirth in Brazil and in these regions were calculated in relation to the maternal and gestational age and education, birth weight, type of pregnancy, delivery type, weight ranges and cause of death. Results There were 579,661 recorded fetal deaths and a decrease of 22.9 % in the stillbirth rate. In 2012, the overall rate was 10.0/1000 births; the North and Northeast regions had the highest rates (10.3 and 12.1, respectively) and the South region had the lowest rate (7.7/1000 births). Two-thirds of the deaths occurred in pregnancies of 28 or more weeks. Low education was an important risk factor, with rates of 24.3/1000 birth in women with no formal education and 4.7/1000 birth in women with 12 or more years of study in 2012. More than 40 % of the causes of deaths were nonspecific. Conclusions Despite the gradual decline in stillbirth rates, Brazil still has stillbirth rates that are nearly two times higher than those found in developed countries. There are inequalities between country regions portrayed by the significant variation in mortality rates specified by cause.

Indexed as

Fetal DeathInfant MortalityAdultBrazilFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal AgePregnancyStillbirthYoung AdultControl methodsEpidemiological surveillanceFetal deathStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID27007985
OpenAlexW2302665742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.