Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27007972›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

CT pulmonary angiography: simultaneous low-pitch dual-source acquisition mode with 70 kVp and 40 ml of contrast medium and comparison with high-pitch spiral dual-source acquisition with automated tube potential selection.

Johannes Boos, Patric Kröpil, Rotem S Lanzman, Joel Aissa, Christoph Schleich, Philipp Heusch, Lino M Sawicki, Gerald Antoch, Christoph Thomas

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Dual-energy CT in pulmonary vascular disease.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Johannes BoosMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Patric KröpilMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Rotem S LanzmanMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Joel AissaMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Christoph SchleichMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Philipp HeuschMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Lino M SawickiMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Gerald AntochMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Christoph ThomasMedical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of a 70-kVp CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocol using simultaneous dual-source (SimDS) acquisition mode with 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) and comparison with a high-pitch spiral dual-source (SpiralDS) acquisition protocol with automated tube potential selection (ATPS).

methodsFollowing the introduction of a new 70-kVp/40-ml SimDS-CTPA protocol in December 2014 for all patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg m(-2), the first 35 patients were retrospectively included in this study and assigned to Group A (BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 66 ± 15 years). The last 35 patients with a BMI below 35 kg m(-2) who had received SpiralDS-CTPA with ATPS were included for comparison (Group B) (70 ml CM; BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 68 ± 16 years). Subjective image quality (image quality) was assessed by two radiologists (from 1, non-diagnostic, to 4, excellent). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose were assessed.

resultsAll examinations were of diagnostic image quality. Subjective image quality, SNR and CNR were comparable between Groups A and B (3.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 0.5, 14.6 ± 6.0 vs 13.9 ± 3.7 and 12.4 ± 5.7 vs 11.6 ± 3.3, respectively; p > 0.05). CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (4.5 ± 1.6 vs 7.5 ± 2.1 mGy, 143.3 ± 44.8 vs 278.3 ± 79.44 mGy cm and 2.0 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 1.1 mSv, respectively; p < 0.05).

conclusion70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality, while radiation dose and CM can be reduced by almost 50% and 40%, respectively, compared with a SpiralDS-CTPA protocol with ATPS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible in patients with a BMI up to 35 kg m(-2) and can help reduce radiation exposure and CM in these patients.

Indexed as

AgedComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationPulmonary ArteryPulmonary EmbolismRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID27007972
PMCPMC5258170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.