Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27007874›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2016

Optimization of microelectrophoresis to select highly negatively charged sperm.

Luke Simon, Kristin Murphy, Kenneth I Aston, Benjamin R Emery, James M Hotaling, Douglas T Carrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luke SimonAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kristin MurphyAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Kenneth I AstonAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Benjamin R EmeryAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
James M HotalingAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Douglas T CarrellAndrology and IVF Laboratory, Department of Surgery (Urology), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. douglas.carrell@hsc.utah.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe sperm membrane undergoes extensive surface remodeling as it matures in the epididymis. During this process, the sperm is encapsulated in an extensive glycocalyx layer, which provides the membrane with its characteristic negative electrostatic charge. In this study, we develop a method of microelectrophoresis and standardize the protocol to isolate sperm with high negative membrane charge.

methodsUnder an electric field, the percentage of positively charged sperm (PCS), negatively charged sperm (NCS), and neutrally charged sperm was determined for each ejaculate prior to and following density gradient centrifugation (DGC), and evaluated for sperm DNA damage, and histone retention. Subsequently, PCS, NCS, and neutrally charged sperm were selected using an ICSI needle and directly analyzed for DNA damage.

resultsWhen raw semen was analyzed using microelectrophoresis, 94 % were NCS. In contrast, DGC completely or partially stripped the negative membrane charge from sperm resulting PCS and neutrally charged sperm, while the charged sperm populations are increased with an increase in electrophoretic current. Following DGC, high sperm DNA damage and abnormal histone retention were inversely correlated with percentage NCS and directly correlated with percentage PCS. NCS exhibited significantly lower DNA damage when compared with control (P < 0.05) and PCS (P < 0.05). When the charged sperm population was corrected for neutrally charged sperm, sperm DNA damage was strongly associated with NCS at a lower electrophoretic current.

conclusionThe results suggest that selection of NCS at lower current may be an important biomarker to select healthy sperm for assisted reproductive treatment.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDNA DamageElectrophoresisGlycocalyxHumansMaleSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSurface PropertiesBiomarkersMembrane glycocalyxMicro-electrophoresisSperm DNA damageSperm membrane chargeSperm selection

Identifiers

PMID27007874
PMCPMC4889482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.