Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27007753›Full record

Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2016

Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital as an oral hygiene evaluation tool to assess plaque accumulation and enamel demineralization in orthodontics.

Cara C Miller, Girvan Burnside, Susan M Higham, Norah L Flannigan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05738356 (Comparison of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems in White Spot Lesion Development), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05738356 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems in White Spot Lesion Development: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorJordan University of Science and TechnologyRan2021 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsWhite Spot LesionArmsAdhesive bonding systems
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cara C Millera  Post-CCST Registrar in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, Manchester Dental Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Girvan Burnsideb  Lecturer, Department of Biostatistics and School of Dentistry, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Susan M Highamc  Professor, Department of Clinical Dental Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Norah L Flannigand  Senior Clinical Lecturer and Honorary Consultant, Department of Orthodontics, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity Dental Hospital of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the use of Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital as an oral hygiene evaluation tool during orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 33 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment were randomly allocated to receive oral hygiene reinforcement at four consecutive appointments using either white light (WL) or Quantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital (QLF) images, taken with a device, as visual aids. Oral hygiene was recorded assessing the QLF images for demineralization, by fluorescence loss (ΔF), and plaque coverage (ΔR30). A debriefing questionnaire ascertained patient perspectives.

resultsThere were no significant differences in demineralization (P  =  .56) or plaque accumulation (P  =  .82) between the WL and QLF groups from T0 to T4. There was no significant reduction in demineralization, ΔF, in the WL, or the QLF group from T0-T4 (P > .05); however, there was a significant reduction in ΔR30 plaque scores (P < .05). All the participants found being shown the images helpful, with 100% of the QLF group reflecting that it would be useful to have oral hygiene reinforcement for the full duration of treatment compared with 81% of the WL group (OR 2.3; P < .05).

conclusionsQuantitative Light-induced Fluorescence-Digital can be used to detect and monitor demineralization and plaque during orthodontics. Oral hygiene reinforcement at consecutive appointments using WL or QLF images as visual aids is effective in reducing plaque coverage. In terms of clinical benefits, QLF and WL images are of similar effectiveness; however, patients preferred the QLF images.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueOral HygieneTooth DemineralizationAdolescentAdultChildDental CariesDental EnamelFemaleFluorescenceHumansMaleOrthodontic AppliancesOrthodonticsProspective StudiesYoung AdultDemineralizationOral hygiene reinforcementOrthodontic treatmentPlaqueQuantitative Light-induced Fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID27007753
PMCPMC8597339
OpenAlexW2306161787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.