Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006969›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2016

Comparative study of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) and human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) as a treatment for retinal dystrophies.

Marina Riera, Laura Fontrodona, Silvia Albert, Diana Mora Ramirez, Anna Seriola, Anna Salas, Yolanda Muñoz, David Ramos, Maria Paz Villegas-Perez, Miguel Angel Zapata and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases.Neural regeneration research · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Marina RieraOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Microcirurgia Ocular (IMO), Barcelona, Spain.
Laura FontrodonaOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR) , Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia AlbertCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Diana Mora RamirezOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Bellaterra, Spain.
Anna SeriolaCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB) , Barcelona, Spain.
Anna SalasOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR) , Barcelona, Spain.
Yolanda MuñozCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB) , Barcelona, Spain.
David RamosCenter of Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy (CBATEG), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria Paz Villegas-PerezOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Murcia , Murcia, Spain.
Miguel Angel ZapataOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR) , Barcelona, Spain.
Angel RayaCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB), Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain; Center for Networked Biomedical Research on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain.
Jesus RuberteCenter of Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy (CBATEG), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain; CIISA, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal; Department of Anatomy and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain.
Anna VeigaCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona (CMRB) , Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Garcia-ArumiOphthalmology Research, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Microcirurgia Ocular (IMO), Barcelona, Spain.
Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESCenter of Regenerative Medicine in Barcelona · ESUniversity of Lisbon · PTBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESInstituto de Microcirugía Ocular · ESRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversidad de Murcia · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal dystrophies (RD) are major causes of familial blindness and are characterized by progressive dysfunction of photoreceptor and/or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the therapeutic effects of two pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-based therapies. We differentiated RPE from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) or human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and transplanted them into the subretinal space of the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) rat. Once differentiated, cells from either source of PSC resembled mature RPE in their morphology and gene expression profile. Following transplantation, both hESC- and hiPSC-derived cells maintained the expression of specific RPE markers, lost their proliferative capacity, established tight junctions, and were able to perform phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments. Remarkably, grafted areas showed increased numbers of photoreceptor nuclei and outer segment disk membranes. Regardless of the cell source, human transplants protected retina from cell apoptosis, glial stress and accumulation of autofluorescence, and responded better to light stimuli. Altogether, our results show that hESC- and hiPSC-derived cells survived, migrated, integrated, and functioned as RPE in the RCS rat retina, providing preclinical evidence that either PSC source could be of potential benefit for treating RD.

Identifiers

PMID27006969
PMCPMC4793806
OpenAlexW2331724207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.