ArticleDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)2014
Developing checklists to prevent diagnostic error in Emergency Room settings.
Article in Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Checklists to reduce diagnostic error: a systematic review of the literature using a human factors framework.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019Pooled it
- Differential diagnosis checklists reduce diagnostic error differentially: A randomised experiment.Medical education · 2021Trial
- Effects of Use of Primary Care Checklists and of Extent of Clinical Experience on Performance in Interpreting Paediatric ECGs Linked to Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Operationalising adult eating disorders admission criteria in Australian emergency departments: a clinical decision-support approach.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Validation of an Infarction Code Care Checklist and Determination of its Relationship With Other Patient Safety Indicators: Protocol for a Prospective Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Simulated Emergency Room Sign-outs: What They Tell Us About Diagnostic Accuracy and Opportunities for Improvement.Journal of patient safety · 2025Article
- Management of acute exacerbations of COPD in the emergency department and its associations with clinical variables.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical reasoning in dire times. Analysis of cognitive biases in clinical cases during the COVID-19 pandemic.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Article
- What Causes Diagnostic Errors? Referred Patients and Our Own Cognitive Biases: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2022Review
- Diagnostic error in the pediatric hospital: a narrative review.Hospital practice (1995) · 2021Review
- Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- SAFER diagnosis: a teaching system to help reduce diagnostic errors in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020Article
- Perception of the usability and implementation of a metacognitive mnemonic to check cognitive errors in clinical setting.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- Patient injury claims involving fractures of the distal radius.Acta orthopaedica · 2018Article
- A portable mnemonic to facilitate checking for cognitive errors.BMC research notes · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChecklists have been shown to improve performance of complex, error-prone processes. To develop a checklist with potential to reduce the likelihood of diagnostic error for patients presenting to the Emergency Room (ER) with undiagnosed conditions.
methodsParticipants included 15 staff ER physicians working in two large academic centers. A rapid cycle design and evaluation process was used to develop a general checklist for high-risk situations vulnerable to diagnostic error. Physicians used the general checklists and a set of symptom-specific checklists for a period of 2 months. We conducted a mixed methods evaluation that included interviews regarding user perceptions and quantitative assessment of resource utilization before and after checklist use.
resultsA general checklist was developed iteratively by obtaining feedback from users and subject matter experts, and was trialed along with a set of specific checklists in the ER. Both the general and the symptom-specific checklists were judged to be helpful, with a slight preference for using symptom-specific lists. Checklist use commonly prompted consideration of additional diagnostic possibilities, changed the working diagnosis in approximately 10% of cases, and anecdotally was thought to be helpful in avoiding diagnostic errors. Checklist use was prompted by a variety of different factors, not just diagnostic uncertainty. None of the physicians used the checklists in collaboration with the patient, despite being encouraged to do so. Checklist use did not prompt large changes in test ordering or consultation.
conclusionsIn the ER setting, checklists for diagnosis are helpful in considering additional diagnostic possibilities, thus having potential to prevent diagnostic errors. Inconsistent usage and using the checklists privately, instead of with the patient, are factors that may detract from obtaining maximum benefit. Further research is needed to optimize checklists for use in the ER, determine how to increase usage, to evaluate the impact of checklist utilization on error rates and patient outcomes, to determine how checklist usage affects test ordering and consultation, and to compare checklists generally with other approaches to reduce diagnostic error.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.