Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006783›Full record

ArticleZoological letters2016

Mode of reduction in the number of pharyngeal segments within the sarcopterygians.

Victoria Shone, Silvan Oulion, Didier Casane, Patrick Laurenti, Anthony Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria ShoneDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, Kings College London, London, SE1 1UL UK.
Silvan OulionLaboratoire Évolution, génomes, comportement, écologie, CNRS université Paris-Sud UMR 9191, IRD UMR 247, Avenue de la Terrasse, bâtiment 13, boîte postale 1, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Didier CasaneLaboratoire Évolution, génomes, comportement, écologie, CNRS université Paris-Sud UMR 9191, IRD UMR 247, Avenue de la Terrasse, bâtiment 13, boîte postale 1, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Patrick LaurentiLaboratoire Évolution, génomes, comportement, écologie, CNRS université Paris-Sud UMR 9191, IRD UMR 247, Avenue de la Terrasse, bâtiment 13, boîte postale 1, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Anthony GrahamDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, Kings College London, London, SE1 1UL UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-7188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharyngeal segmentation is a defining feature of vertebrate embryos and is apparent as a series of bulges found on the lateral surface of the embryonic head, the pharyngeal arches. The ancestral condition for gnathostomes is to have seven pharyngeal segments: jaw, hyoid, and five posterior branchial arches. However, within the sarcopterygians, the pharyngeal region has undergone extensive remodelling that resulted in a reduction in the number of pharyngeal segments, such that amniotes have only five pharyngeal arches. The aim of this study is to probe the developmental basis of this loss of pharyngeal segments.

resultsWe have therefore compared the development of the pharyngeal arches in an amniote, the chick, which has five segments, with those of a chondrichthyan, the catshark, which has seven segments. We have analysed the early phase of pharyngeal segmentation and we find that in both the most anterior segments form first with the posterior segments being added sequentially. We also documented the patterns of innervation of the pharynx in several vertebrates and note that the three most anterior segments receive distinct innervation: the first arch being innervated by the Vth nerve, the second by the VIIth and the third by the IXth. Finally, we have analysed Hox gene expression, and show that the anterior limit of Hoxa2 aligns with the second pouch and arch in both chick and catshark, while Hoxa3 is transiently associated with the third arch and pouch. Surprisingly, we have found that Hoxb1 expression is spatially and temporally dynamic and that it is always associated with the last most recently formed pouch and that this domains moves caudally as additional pouches are generated.

conclusionWe propose that the first three pharyngeal segments are homologous, as is the posterior limit of the pharynx, and that the loss of segments occurred between these two points. We suggest that this loss results from a curtailment of the posterior expansion of the pharyngeal endoderm in amniotes at relatively earlier time point, and thus the generation of fewer segments.

Indexed as

EndodermHoxb1PharyngealSarcopterygiansSegmentationTetrapods

Identifiers

PMID27006783
PMCPMC4802614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.