Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006763›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2016

A systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative oral decontamination in patients undergoing major elective surgery.

Philip Spreadborough, Sarah Lort, Sandro Pasquali, Matthew Popplewell, Andrew Owen, Irene Kreis, Olga Tucker, Ravinder S Vohra, Preventing Postoperative Pneumonia Study Group and the West Midlands Research Collaborative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Philip SpreadboroughWest Midlands Research Collaborative, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK.
Sarah LortWest Midlands Research Collaborative, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK.
Sandro PasqualiDepartment of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Matthew PopplewellWest Midlands Research Collaborative, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK.
Andrew OwenSchool of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Irene KreisClinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons England, London, UK.
Olga TuckerDepartment of Upper Gastro-Intestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK ; Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, 4th Floor, (Old) Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK.
Ravinder S VohraWest Midlands Research Collaborative, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH UK ; Nottingham Oesophagi-Gastric unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK.
Preventing Postoperative Pneumonia Study Group and the West Midlands Research Collaborative
University of Birmingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRoyal College of Surgeons of England · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L017261/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral antiseptics reduce nosocomial infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill medical and surgical patients intubated for prolonged periods. However, the role of oral antiseptics given before and after planned surgery is not clear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine the effect of oral antiseptics (chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine) when administered before and after major elective surgery.

methodsSearches were conducted of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The analysis was performed using the random-effects method and the risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI).

resultsOf 1114 unique identified articles, perioperative chlorhexidine was administered to patients undergoing elective surgery in four studies. This identified 2265 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery, of whom 1093 (48.3 %) received perioperative chlorhexidine. Postoperative pneumonia and nosocomial infections were observed in 5.3 and 20.2 % who received chlorhexidine compared to 10.4 and 31.3 % who received a control preparation, respectively. Oral perioperative chlorhexidine significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pneumonia (RR = 0.52; 95 % CI 0.39-0.71; p < 0.01) and overall nosocomial infections (RR = 0.65; 95 % CI 0.52-0.81; p < 0.01), with no effect on in-hospital mortality (RR = 1.01; 95 % CI 0.49-2.09; p = 0.98).

conclusionsPerioperative oral chlorhexidine significantly decreases the incidence of nosocomial infection and postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. There are no randomised controlled studies of this simple and cheap intervention in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery.

trial registrationThis systematic review was registered with the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). The registration number is CRD42015016063.

Indexed as

Anti-infective agentsChlorhexidinePerioperative carePneumonia

Identifiers

PMID27006763
PMCPMC4802585
OpenAlexW2312105860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.