Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006728›Full record

ArticleThe open rheumatology journal2016

Two-Year Safety and Efficacy Experience in Patients with Methotrexate-Resistant Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept and Conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs in the Latin American Region.

Daniel A Machado, Renato Guzman, Ricardo M Xavier, Jesus A Simon, Linda Mele, Qi Shen, Ronald Pedersen, Sameer Kotak, Bonnie Vlahos

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The open rheumatology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00848354 (A Randomized, Open-label Study In The Latin America Region Comparing The Safety And Efficacy Of Etanercept With Conventional Dmard Therapy In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00848354 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized, Open-label Study In The Latin America Region Comparing The Safety And Efficacy Of Etanercept With Conventional Dmard Therapy In Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2009 to 2013Enrolled429ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsPhase 1: Etanercept, Phase 1: Methotrexate, Phase 2: Optional ETN, SSZ, HCQ, MTX, Phase 1: Conventiaonal DMARD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel A MachadoCAICI Institute, Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Renato GuzmanIDEARG; Saludcoop Clinic, Bogota, Colombia.
Ricardo M XavierHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jesus A SimonUniversidad Marista de Mérida; BIOCEM/Hospital CEM, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico.
Linda MelePfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Qi ShenPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Ronald PedersenPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Sameer KotakPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.
Bonnie VlahosPfizer, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough long-term data are available from biologic studies in North American/European populations with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), long-term findings in Latin American RA populations are limited.

objectiveTo examine long-term safety/efficacy of etanercept, methotrexate, and/or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in Latin American patients with moderate-to-severe active RA.

methodsIn the first phase of this open-label study, patients were randomized to etanercept 50 mg weekly plus methotrexate or conventional DMARD (hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine) plus methotrexate for 24 weeks. At the start of the second phase (week 24), investigators selected a treatment regimen that included any combination/dosage of etanercept, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, or sulfasalazine based on previous treatment response, preference, and local product labeling, and was continued for the 104-week extension.

resultsIn the extension, in the group previously randomized to etanercept-plus-methotrexate therapy, etanercept was continued in 259/260 patients; methotrexate continued in 260/260; and hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine added in 8/260 and 3/260, respectively. In the group previously randomized to conventional DMARD-plus-methotrexate therapy, conventional DMARD was discontinued in 86/126 and etanercept added in 105/126. Among etanercept-exposed patients (total exposure, 798.1 patient-year [PY]), rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and serious infections per PY were 1.7, 0.07, and 0.02 events per PY. In both groups, after treatment modification was permitted, clinical response rates and improvements in clinical/patient-reported outcomes from baseline were sustained to week 128.

conclusionAfter investigators were permitted to modify treatment, etanercept was part of the treatment regimen in 95% of patients. Continuation or addition of etanercept in the 2-year extension resulted in a consistently good risk:benefit profile.

trial registrationOpen-Label Study Comparing Etanercept to Conventional Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy; ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00848354; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00848354.

Indexed as

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugsetanerceptLatin Americamethotrexaterheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27006728
PMCPMC4780479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.