Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006463›Full record

ArticlemBio2016

Role of Multicellular Aggregates in Biofilm Formation.

Kasper N Kragh, Jaime B Hutchison, Gavin Melaugh, Chris Rodesney, Aled E L Roberts, Yasuhiko Irie, Peter Ø Jensen, Stephen P Diggle, Rosalind J Allen, Vernita Gordon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kasper N KraghDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jaime B HutchisonCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Gavin MelaughSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Chris RodesneyCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Aled E L RobertsCentre for Biomolecular Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Yasuhiko IrieDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Peter Ø JensenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stephen P DiggleCentre for Biomolecular Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rosalind J AllenSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vernita GordonCenter for Nonlinear Dynamics and Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA Gordon@chaos.utexas.edu tbjarnsholt@sund.ku.dk.
Thomas BjarnsholtDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Gordon@chaos.utexas.edu tbjarnsholt@sund.ku.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn traditional models ofin vitrobiofilm development, individual bacterial cells seed a surface, multiply, and mature into multicellular, three-dimensional structures. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms governing the initial attachment of single cells to surfaces. However, in natural environments and during infection, bacterial cells tend to clump as multicellular aggregates, and biofilms can also slough off aggregates as a part of the dispersal process. This makes it likely that biofilms are often seeded by aggregates and single cells, yet how these aggregates impact biofilm initiation and development is not known. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational approaches to determine the relative fitness of single cells and preformed aggregates during early development ofPseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. We find that the relative fitness of aggregates depends markedly on the density of surrounding single cells, i.e., the level of competition for growth resources. When competition between aggregates and single cells is low, an aggregate has a growth disadvantage because the aggregate interior has poor access to growth resources. However, if competition is high, aggregates exhibit higher fitness, because extending vertically above the surface gives cells at the top of aggregates better access to growth resources. Other advantages of seeding by aggregates, such as earlier switching to a biofilm-like phenotype and enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and immune response, may add to this ecological benefit. Our findings suggest that current models of biofilm formation should be reconsidered to incorporate the role of aggregates in biofilm initiation. IMPORTANCE: During the past decades, there has been a consensus around the model of development of a biofilm, involving attachment of single planktonic bacterial cells to a surface and the subsequent development of a mature biofilm. This study presents results that call for a modification of this rigorous model. We show how free floating biofilm aggregates can have a profound local effect on biofilm development when attaching to a surface. Our findings show that an aggregate landing on a surface will eventually outcompete the biofilm population arising from single cells attached around the aggregate and dominate the local biofilm development. These results point to a regime where preformed biofilm aggregates may have a fitness advantage over planktonic cells when it comes to accessing nutrients. Our findings add to the increasingly prominent comprehension that biofilm lifestyle is the default for bacteria and that planktonic single cells may be only a transition state at the most.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionBiofilmsComputer SimulationPseudomonas aeruginosa

Identifiers

PMID27006463
PMCPMC4807362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.