ArticlemBio2016
Role of Multicellular Aggregates in Biofilm Formation.
Article in mBio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
173 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Biofilm formation and multispecies interactions of bacteria recovered from drinking water systems in broiler houses and piglet nursery units.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Sporulation modulates viscoelastic development through extracellular matrix restructuring inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Targeting of Oral Bacterial Taxa Linked to Disease by Flavonols.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterization ofJournal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- Fragmented but functional: Post-dispersion dynamics and phenotypic variation in dispersed biofilm-associated cells.Biofilm · 2026Article
- Rethinking Microbial Chemical Ecology: Secondary Metabolites as Concentration-Dependent Signaling Hubs with Implications for Anti-Virulence Intervention.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Ready-to-Use or Ready-to-Adapt: Can the Self-Healing Potential ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Raman spectroscopy reveals growth phase-dependent molecular differences in bacterial membrane vesicles.Journal of bacteriology · 2026Article
- Spatial structure: shaping the ecology and evolution of microbial communities.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- BacQuant: A Scalable Automated Image Processing Pipeline for Quantifying Biofilm Aggregates.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Characterization of Antibiofilm Molecules from Bovine Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.PloS one · 2026Article
- Biophysics of Bacterial Colonial Structures and the Occupancy of Microecological Spaces.Biology · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of a Plasma Vaginal Cleanser (WOMEN CAREBiomedicines · 2025Article
- Flagellar motility and the mucus environment influence aggregation-mediated antibiotic tolerance ofmBio · 2025Article
- AInfection and immunity · 2025Article
- Ex vivo oral biofilm model for rapid screening of antimicrobial agents including natural cranberry polyphenols.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- 5-Fluorouracil Inhibits Bacterial Growth and Reduces Biofilm in Addition to Having Synergetic Effects with Gentamicin AgainstMicroorganisms · 2024Article
113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledIn traditional models ofin vitrobiofilm development, individual bacterial cells seed a surface, multiply, and mature into multicellular, three-dimensional structures. Much research has been devoted to elucidating the mechanisms governing the initial attachment of single cells to surfaces. However, in natural environments and during infection, bacterial cells tend to clump as multicellular aggregates, and biofilms can also slough off aggregates as a part of the dispersal process. This makes it likely that biofilms are often seeded by aggregates and single cells, yet how these aggregates impact biofilm initiation and development is not known. Here we use a combination of experimental and computational approaches to determine the relative fitness of single cells and preformed aggregates during early development ofPseudomonas aeruginosabiofilms. We find that the relative fitness of aggregates depends markedly on the density of surrounding single cells, i.e., the level of competition for growth resources. When competition between aggregates and single cells is low, an aggregate has a growth disadvantage because the aggregate interior has poor access to growth resources. However, if competition is high, aggregates exhibit higher fitness, because extending vertically above the surface gives cells at the top of aggregates better access to growth resources. Other advantages of seeding by aggregates, such as earlier switching to a biofilm-like phenotype and enhanced resilience toward antibiotics and immune response, may add to this ecological benefit. Our findings suggest that current models of biofilm formation should be reconsidered to incorporate the role of aggregates in biofilm initiation. IMPORTANCE: During the past decades, there has been a consensus around the model of development of a biofilm, involving attachment of single planktonic bacterial cells to a surface and the subsequent development of a mature biofilm. This study presents results that call for a modification of this rigorous model. We show how free floating biofilm aggregates can have a profound local effect on biofilm development when attaching to a surface. Our findings show that an aggregate landing on a surface will eventually outcompete the biofilm population arising from single cells attached around the aggregate and dominate the local biofilm development. These results point to a regime where preformed biofilm aggregates may have a fitness advantage over planktonic cells when it comes to accessing nutrients. Our findings add to the increasingly prominent comprehension that biofilm lifestyle is the default for bacteria and that planktonic single cells may be only a transition state at the most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.