Trial reportNeuro-oncology2016
Upfront bevacizumab may extend survival for glioblastoma patients who do not receive second-line therapy: an exploratory analysis of AVAglio.
Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Blood-Based Biomarkers in High Grade Gliomas: a Systematic Review.Molecular neurobiology · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Traditional Chinese Medicine-Derived Active Ingredient and Formulation Therapy for Glioma: Multi-Target Mechanisms, Drug Delivery Systems, and Advances in Clinical Translational Research.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Treatment mechanism and research progress of bevacizumab for glioblastoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Update on Chemotherapeutic Approaches and Management of Bevacizumab Usage for Glioblastoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- First-line bevacizumab contributes to survival improvement in glioblastoma patients complementary to temozolomide.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- The Effect of Glucocorticoids on Angiogenesis in the Treatment of Solid Tumors.Journal of cellular signaling · 2020Article
- Early platelet variation during concomitant chemo-radiotherapy predicts adjuvant temozolomide-induced thrombocytopenia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Article
- Molecular ablation of tumor blood vessels inhibits therapeutic effects of radiation and bevacizumab.Neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- Article
- Bevacizumab as an adjuvant therapy for glioblastoma in elderly patients: the facts.Translational cancer research · 2018Article
- Rechallenge with bevacizumab in patients with glioblastoma progressing off therapy.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- The siren song of bevacizumab: swan song or clarion call?Neuro-oncology · 2018Review
- Histopathological vascular investigation of the peritumoral brain zone of glioblastomas.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Article
- COX-2/sEH dual inhibitor PTUPB suppresses glioblastoma growth by targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and hyaluronan mediated motility receptor.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- On glioblastoma and the search for a cure: where do we stand?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017Review
- Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, treated with bevacizumab.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017Review
- Assessment of vascularity in glioblastoma and its implications on patient outcomes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this post-hoc, exploratory analysis, we examined outcomes for patients enrolled in the AVAglio trial of front-line bevacizumab or placebo plus radiotherapy/temozolomide who received only a single line of therapy.
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received protocol-defined treatment until progressive disease (PD). Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). After confirmed PD, patients were treated at the investigators' discretion. PFS/OS were assessed in patients with a PFS event who did not receive post-PD therapy (Group 1) and patients with a PFS event who received post-PD therapy plus patients who did not have a PFS event at the final data cutoff (Group 2). Kaplan-Meier methodology was used. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model for known prognostic variables was generated.
resultsBaseline characteristics were balanced. In patients with a PFS event who did not receive post-PD therapy (Group 1; n = 225 [24.4% of the intent-to-treat population]), the addition of bevacizumab to radiotherapy/temozolomide resulted in a 3.6-month extension in both median PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, P = .0016) and median OS (HR: 0.67, P = .0102). Multivariate analyses supported this OS benefit (HR: 0.66). In the remaining patients (Group 2; n = 696), a 5.2-month PFS extension was observed in bevacizumab-treated patients (HR: 0.61, P < .0001); OS was comparable between the treatment arms (HR: 0.88, P = .1502). No significant differences in safety were observed between the 2 groups.
conclusionThis exploratory analysis suggests that the addition of bevacizumab to standard glioblastoma treatment prolongs PFS and OS for patients with PD who receive only one line of therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.