Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27006077›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

McTwo: a two-step feature selection algorithm based on maximal information coefficient.

Ruiquan Ge, Manli Zhou, Youxi Luo, Qinghan Meng, Guoqin Mai, Dongli Ma, Guoqing Wang, Fengfeng Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Feature Selection Method Based on Graph Theory for Cancer Classification.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer Detection and Prediction Using Genetic Algorithms.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruiquan GeShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China.
Manli ZhouShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China.
Youxi LuoShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China.
Qinghan MengShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China.
Guoqin MaiShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China.
Dongli MaShenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518026, P.R. China. madl1234@126.com.
Guoqing WangDepartment of Pathogenobiology, Basic Medical College of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China. qing@jlu.edu.cn.
Fengfeng ZhouShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, and Key Lab for Health Informatics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Avenue, Shenzhen University Town, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, P.R. China. FengfengZhou@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput bio-OMIC technologies are producing high-dimension data from bio-samples at an ever increasing rate, whereas the training sample number in a traditional experiment remains small due to various difficulties. This "large p, small n" paradigm in the area of biomedical "big data" may be at least partly solved by feature selection algorithms, which select only features significantly associated with phenotypes. Feature selection is an NP-hard problem. Due to the exponentially increased time requirement for finding the globally optimal solution, all the existing feature selection algorithms employ heuristic rules to find locally optimal solutions, and their solutions achieve different performances on different datasets.

resultsThis work describes a feature selection algorithm based on a recently published correlation measurement, Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC). The proposed algorithm, McTwo, aims to select features associated with phenotypes, independently of each other, and achieving high classification performance of the nearest neighbor algorithm. Based on the comparative study of 17 datasets, McTwo performs about as well as or better than existing algorithms, with significantly reduced numbers of selected features. The features selected by McTwo also appear to have particular biomedical relevance to the phenotypes from the literature.

conclusionMcTwo selects a feature subset with very good classification performance, as well as a small feature number. So McTwo may represent a complementary feature selection algorithm for the high-dimensional biomedical datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansSoftwareFeature selectionFilter algorithmHeuristic algorithmMaximal information coefficient (MIC)Wrapper algorithm

Identifiers

PMID27006077
PMCPMC4804474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.