Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27005698›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Learning stochastic process-based models of dynamical systems from knowledge and data.

Jovan Tanevski, Ljupčo Todorovski, Sašo Džeroski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2020
    Article
  3. A practical method for estimating coupling functions in complex dynamical systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jovan TanevskiJožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. jovan.tanevski@ijs.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7177-1003
Ljupčo TodorovskiUniversity of Ljubljana, Gosarjeva ulica 5, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Sašo DžeroskiJožef Stefan Institute, Jamova cesta 39, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying a proper model structure, using methods that address both structural and parameter uncertainty, is a crucial problem within the systems approach to biology. And yet, it has a marginal presence in the recent literature. While many existing approaches integrate methods for simulation and parameter estimation of a single model to address parameter uncertainty, only few of them address structural uncertainty at the same time. The methods for handling structure uncertainty often oversimplify the problem by allowing the human modeler to explicitly enumerate a relatively small number of alternative model structures. On the other hand, process-based modeling methods provide flexible modular formalisms for specifying large classes of plausible model structures, but their scope is limited to deterministic models. Here, we aim at extending the scope of process-based modeling methods to inductively learn stochastic models from knowledge and data.

resultsWe combine the flexibility of process-based modeling in terms of addressing structural uncertainty with the benefits of stochastic modeling. The proposed method combines search trough the space of plausible model structures, the parsimony principle and parameter estimation to identify a model with optimal structure and parameters. We illustrate the utility of the proposed method on four stochastic modeling tasks in two domains: gene regulatory networks and epidemiology. Within the first domain, using synthetically generated data, the method successfully recovers the structure and parameters of known regulatory networks from simulations. In the epidemiology domain, the method successfully reconstructs previously established models of epidemic outbreaks from real, sparse and noisy measurement data.

conclusionsThe method represents a unified approach to modeling dynamical systems that allows for flexible formalization of the space of candidate model structures, deterministic and stochastic interpretation of model dynamics, and automated induction of model structure and parameters from data. The method is able to reconstruct models of dynamical systems from synthetic and real data.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalComputational BiologyDisease OutbreaksGene Regulatory NetworksHumansInfluenza, HumanKineticsPlagueStochastic ProcessesUncertaintyCompartmental epidemiological modelsDynamical systemsGenetic regulatory networksProcess-based modelingStochastic modelsStructural uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27005698
PMCPMC4802653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.