Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27005688›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2016

The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yifei Lin, Sike Lai, Jin Huang, Liang Du

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07507409 (Innovative Sternal Closure Techniques), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07507409 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Innovative Sternal Closure Techniques: Evaluating STRATAFIX™ and DERMABOND™ for Reduced Complications in CABG Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2026 to 2028Enrolled401ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection, Superficial Sternal Wound Infection, MediastinitisArmsKnotless Barbed Sutures, Mesh-based Topical Skin Adhesive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Determinants of residual myometrial thickness after cesarean delivery: Comparative analysis of barbed versus conventional sutures-A sub-analysis from the SPIRAL trial.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Trial
  6. Barbed suture in neck dissection: a randomized clinical study on efficacy, safety and aesthetic outcome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  7. Anterolateral advancement pharyngoplasty versus barbed reposition pharyngoplasty in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yifei LinInstitute of Urology, Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Sike LaiWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jin HuangWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Liang DuWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang 37, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The knotless barbed suture is an innovative type of suture that can accelerate the placement of sutures and eliminate knot tying. However, the outcomes of previous studies are still confounding. This study reviewed the application of different types of barbed sutures in different surgeries. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the application of barbed sutures up to Feb. 2015. Two reviewers independently screened the literature and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis was performed. Seventeen RCTs (low to moderate risk of bias) involving 1992 patients were included. Compared with conventional sutures, the barbed suture could reduce suture time (SMD=-0.95, 95%CI -1.43 to -0.46, P = 0.0001) and the operative time (SMD=-0.28, 95%CI -0.46 to -0.10, P = 0.003), not significantly increase the estimated blood loss (SMD=-0.09, 95%CI -0.52 to 0.35, P = 0.70), but could lead to more postoperative complications (OR = 1.43, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.96, P = 0.03), These results varied in subgroups. Thus, barbed sutures are effective in reducing the suture and operative time, but the safety evidences are still not sufficient. It need be evaluated based on special surgeries and suture types before put into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalHumansOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSuture TechniquesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27005688
PMCPMC4804241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.