Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27005571›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2016

Predicting multi-class responses to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

Jungsoo Gim, Yong Beom Cho, Hye Kyung Hong, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hong-Gyun Wu, Seung-Yong Jeong, Je-Gun Joung, Taesung Park, Woong-Yang Park and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jungsoo GimInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea.
Yong Beom ChoDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Hye Kyung HongDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Hee Cheol KimDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Seong Hyeon YunDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Hong-Gyun WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 110-799, Korea.
Seung-Yong JeongDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, 110-799, Korea.
Je-Gun JoungSamsung Medical Center, Samsung Genome Institute, Seoul, 135-710, Korea.
Taesung ParkInstitute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Korea. taesungp@gmail.com.
Woong-Yang ParkDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. woongyang@gmail.com.
Woo Yong LeeDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 135-710, Korea. lwy555@skku.edu.
Samsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University · KRSungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become a widely used treatment for improving local control of disease and increasing survival rates of rectal cancer patients. We aimed to identify a set of genes that can be used to predict responses to CRT in patients with rectal cancer.

methodsGene expression profiles of pre-therapeutic biopsy specimens obtained from 77 rectal cancer patients were analyzed using DNA microarrays. The response to CRT was determined using the Dworak tumor regression grade: grade 1 (minimal, MI), grade 2 (moderate, MO), grade 3 (near total, NT), or grade 4 (total, TO).

resultsTop ranked genes for three different feature scores such as a p-value (pval), a rank product (rank), and a normalized product (norm) were selected to distinguish pre-defined groups such as complete responders (TO) from the MI, MO, and NT groups. Among five different classification algorithms, supporting vector machine (SVM) with the top 65 norm features performed at the highest accuracy for predicting MI using a 5-fold cross validation strategy. On the other hand, 98 pval features were selected for predicting TO by elastic net (EN). Finally we combined TO- and MI-finder models to build a three-class classification model and validated it using an independent dataset of rectal cancer mRNA expression.

conclusionsWe identified MI- and TO-finders for predicting preoperative CRT responses, and validated these data using an independent public dataset. This stepwise prediction model requires further evaluation in clinical studies in order to develop personalized preoperative CRT in patients with rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsChemoradiotherapyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisRectal NeoplasmsRNARNA, MessengerTreatment OutcomeRNARNA, MessengerChemoradiotherapyDworak classificationMicroarrayPrediction modelRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID27005571
PMCPMC4804643
OpenAlexW2312001898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.