Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27005474›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Variation in sequences containing microsatellite motifs in the perennial biomass and forage grass, Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae).

Susanne Barth, Marta Jolanta Jankowska, Trevor Roland Hodkinson, Tia Vellani, Manfred Klaas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne BarthTeagasc Crops Environment and Land Use Programme, Oak Park Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland. susanne.barth@teagasc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4104-5964
Marta Jolanta JankowskaTeagasc Crops Environment and Land Use Programme, Oak Park Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.
Trevor Roland HodkinsonDepartment of Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Tia VellaniTeagasc Crops Environment and Land Use Programme, Oak Park Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.
Manfred KlaasTeagasc Crops Environment and Land Use Programme, Oak Park Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland.
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IETrinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forty three microsatellite markers were developed for further genetic characterisation of a forage and biomass grass crop, for which genomic resources are currently scarce. The microsatellite markers were developed from a normalized EST-SSR library. All of the 43 markers gave a clear banding pattern on 3% Metaphor agarose gels. Eight selected SSR markers were tested in detail for polymorphism across eleven DNA samples of large geographic distribution across Europe. The new set of 43 SSR markers will help future research to characterise the genetic structure and diversity of Phalaris arundinacea, with a potential to further understand its invasive character in North American wetlands, as well as aid in breeding work for desired biomass and forage traits. P. arundinacea is particularly valued in the northern latitude as a crop with high biomass potential, even more so on marginal lands.

Indexed as

BiomassGenetic VariationBase SequenceExpressed Sequence TagsGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsNucleotide MotifsPhalarisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideMicrosatellite markersPhalaris arundinaceaPoaceaeReed canary grassSSR

Identifiers

PMID27005474
PMCPMC4804619
OpenAlexW2304289421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.