Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27005291›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Surgical management of postoperative chronic inguinodynia by laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach.

A Moreno-Egea

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Moreno-EgeaAbdominal Wall Unit, La Vega University Hospital, Avda Primo de Rivera 7, 5ºD, 3008, Murcia, Spain. morenoegeaalfredo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-7062
Hero España (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe avoidance of postoperative chronic pain is of the foremost importance and has a deep impact on patient satisfaction. The objective of this study is to evaluate the selective transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic neurectomy for treatment of refractory inguinodynia.

methodsProspective study in a University Hernia Center included 16 consecutive patients with chronic pain. Primary endpoint was pain control (measured by appropriate questionnaire and need of analgesics). Secondary endpoint was surgical morbidity. Follow-up was 2 years (range 12 months-4 years).

resultsThe mean operating time was 52 (range 36-68) minutes, and there were no intraoperative complications. All patients had histologic confirmation of neurectomy. Anatomical variation was found in ten patients (62.5 %), being a common trunk ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve the most frequent (nine patients, 56.25 %). One patient developed hypoesthesia in the territory of the femorocutaneous nerve by nerve injury. Reoperation was performed 6 months afterward to complete ilioinguinal nerve neurectomy. Neuropathic pain medications were continued by five patients. Pain was completely eliminated in 11 (68.75 %).

conclusionsManagement of patients with neural groin pain should be done in a multidisciplinary unit. Selective neurectomy by a transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic approach is a safe and highly effective option in selected patients for the treatment of refractory postoperative chronic pain. Careful anatomical planning is essential to avoid inadvertent injuries and more suffering to these patients.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansInguinal CanalLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockNeuralgiaPelvic PainPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesHernioplastyInguinal painLaparoscopyNeurectomy

Identifiers

PMID27005291
OpenAlexW2311066042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.