Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004958›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2016

Absent words and the (dis)similarity analysis of DNA sequences: an experimental study.

Mohammad Saifur Rahman, Ali Alatabbi, Tanver Athar, Maxime Crochemore, M Sohel Rahman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohammad Saifur RahmanDepartment of CSE, AlEDA Group, BUET, West Palasi, Dhaka, 1205, Bangladesh.
Ali AlatabbiDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.
Tanver AtharDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.
Maxime CrochemoreDepartment of Informatics, King's College London, Strand, London, UK.
M Sohel RahmanDepartment of CSE, AlEDA Group, BUET, West Palasi, Dhaka, 1205, Bangladesh. msrahman@cse.buet.ac.bd.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-6478
King's College London · GBBangladesh University of Engineering and Technology · BD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn absent word with respect to a sequence is a word that does not occur in the sequence as a factor; an absent word is minimal if all its factors on the other hand occur in that sequence. In this paper we explore the idea of using minimal absent words (MAW) to compute the distance between two biological sequences. The motivation and rationale of our work comes from the potential advantage of being able to extract as little information as possible from large genomic sequences to reach the goal of comparing sequences in an alignment-free manner.

findingsWe report an experimental study on the use of absent words as a distance measure among biological sequences. We provide recommendations to use the best index based on our analysis. In particular, our analysis reveals that the best performers are: the length weighted index of relative absent word sets, the length weighted index of the symmetric difference of the MAW sets, and the Jaccard distance between the MAW sets. We also found that during the computation of the absent words, the reverse complements of the sequences should also be considered.

conclusionThe use of MAW to compute the distance between two biological sequences has potential advantage over alignment based methods. It is expected that this potential advantage would encourage researchers and practitioners to use this as a (dis)similarity measure in the context of sequence comparison and phylogeny reconstruction. Therefore, we present here a comparison among different possible models and indexes and pave the path for the biologists and researchers to choose an appropriate model for such comparisons.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBase SequenceHumansPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAAbsent wordsAlignment free comparisonDistance matrixMinimal absent wordsPhylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID27004958
PMCPMC4804535
OpenAlexW2311179366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.