Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004838›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2016

Primary care providers' experiences caring for complex patients in primary care: a qualitative study.

Danielle F Loeb, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Carey Candrian, Frank V deGruy, Ingrid A Binswanger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Basic Psychological Needs and Mental Health in Primary Care: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Float[ing] in the Middle" Nurse Navigators and the Interface of Access to Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Public experiences and perspectives of primary care in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle F LoebDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. danielle.loeb@ucdenver.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1688-8799
Elizabeth A BaylissKaiser Colorado, Kaiser Permanente Institute for Health Research, Denver, USA.
Carey CandrianDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Frank V deGruyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Ingrid A BinswangerDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

Improving Primary Care Management of Complex Patients with Psychiatric IllnessK23MH100162 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LOEB, DANIELLE · 2014 to 2017
$731k
NIMH NIH HHS 1K23MH100162-01A1NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH100162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex patients are increasingly common in primary care and often have poor clinical outcomes. Healthcare system barriers to effective care for complex patients have been previously described, but less is known about the potential impact and meaning of caring for complex patients on a daily basis for primary care providers (PCPs). Our objective was to describe PCPs' experiences providing care for complex patients, including their experiences of health system barriers and facilitators and their strategies to enhance provision of effective care.

methodsUsing a general inductive approach, our qualitative research study was guided by an interpretive epistemology, or way of knowing. Our method for understanding included semi-structured in-depth interviews with internal medicine PCPs from two university-based and three community health clinics. We developed an interview guide, which included questions on PCPs' experiences, perceived system barriers and facilitators, and strategies to improve their ability to effectively treat complex patients. To focus interviews on real cases, providers were asked to bring de-identified clinical notes from patients they considered complex to the interview. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed to develop categories from the raw data, which were then conceptualized into broad themes after team-based discussion.

resultsPCPs (N = 15) described complex patients with multidimensional needs, such as socio-economic, medical, and mental health. A vision of optimal care emerged from the data, which included coordinating care, preventing hospitalizations, and developing patient trust. PCPs relied on professional values and individual care strategies to overcome local and system barriers. Team based approaches were endorsed to improve the management of complex patients.

conclusionsGiven the barriers to effective care described by PCPs, individual PCP efforts alone are unlikely to meet the needs of complex patients. To fulfill PCP's expressed concepts of optimal care, implementation of effective systemic approaches should be considered.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultChronic DiseaseColoradoFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareChronic diseaseDoctor-patient relationshipMedical comorbidityMedical home/patient-centered medical homePrimary careWork related stress

Identifiers

PMID27004838
PMCPMC4804627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.