Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004834›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Tick-borne bacterial pathogens in southwestern Finland.

Jani J Sormunen, Ritva Penttinen, Tero Klemola, Jari Hänninen, Ilppo Vuorinen, Maija Laaksonen, Ilari E Sääksjärvi, Kai Ruohomäki, Eero J Vesterinen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rickettsia spp. in finnish ixodid ticks.Parasites & vectors · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The AxBioTick Study:Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Estimation ofInsects · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jani J SormunenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Ritva PenttinenZoological Museum, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Tero KlemolaDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Jari HänninenArchipelago Research Institute, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Ilppo VuorinenArchipelago Research Institute, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Maija LaaksonenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Ilari E SääksjärviZoological Museum, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Kai RuohomäkiDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland.
Eero J VesterinenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014, Turku, Finland. eero.z.vesterinen@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3665-5802
University of Turku · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIxodes ricinus and Ixodes persulcatus are the main vectors of Lyme borreliosis spirochetes and several other zoonotic bacteria in northern Europe and Russia. However, few studies screening bacterial pathogens in Finnish ticks have been conducted. Therefore, reports on the occurrence and prevalence of several bacterial pathogens detected from ticks elsewhere in Europe and Russia are altogether missing from Finland. The main aim of the current study was to produce novel data on the occurrence and prevalence of several tick-borne bacterial pathogens in ticks collected from southwestern Finland.

methodsTicks were collected in 2013-2014 by blanket dragging from 25 localities around southwestern Finland, and additionally from a dog in Lempäälä. Collected ticks were molecularly identified and screened for Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., Borrelia miyamotoi, Rickettsia, Bartonella and Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis using quantitative PCR. Furthermore, detected Rickettsia spp. were sequenced using conventional PCR to determine species.

resultsA total of 3169 ticks in 1174 DNA samples were screened for the listed pathogens. The most common bacteria detected was B. burgdorferi (s.l.) (18.5 % nymphal and 23.5 % adult ticks), followed by Rickettsia spp. (1.1 %; 5.1 %) and B. miyamotoi (0.51 %; 1.02 %). B. miyamotoi and Rickettsia spp. were also detected in larval samples (minimum infection rates 0.31 % and 0.21 %, respectively). Detected Rickettsia spp. were identified by sequencing as R. helvetica and R. monacensis. All screened samples were negative for Bartonella spp. and Ca. N. mikurensis.

conclusionsIn the current study we report for the first time the presence of Rickettsia in Finnish ticks. Furthermore, Rickettsia spp. and B. miyamotoi were found from larval tick samples, emphasizing the importance they may have as vectors of these pathogens. Comparisons of tick density estimates and B. burgdorferi (s.l.) prevalence made between the current study and a previous study conducted in 2000 in ten out of the 25 study localities suggest that an increase in tick abundance and B. burgdorferi (s.l.) prevalence has occurred in at least some of the study localities.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaFinlandReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNATicksBartonellaBorrelia burgdorferiBorrelia miyamotoiCandidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensisFinlandIxodes persulcatusIxodes ricinusRickettsiaTick-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID27004834
PMCPMC4802833
OpenAlexW2311793503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.