ArticleBMC medical ethics2016
Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond cost-effectiveness: a reflective commentary on adapting global health technology assessment for equity considerations in South Africa and other LMICs.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- How Could Artificial Intelligence Change the Doctor-Patient Relationship? A Medical Ethics Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Ethics domains in full health technology assessment reports: an attempt to begin mapping the field.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- "Blanket rules just don't work": Qualitative exploration of the relative value of child and adult quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains for health technology assessment.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- The New Italian Guidelines for Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ART): Ethical and Medico-Legal Issues.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: A scoping review.PloS one · 2025Article
- Application of health technology assessment: a new need for an ethical neonatology.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Review
- Article
- A study on the impact of sports participation support on the level of sports participation of urban junior high school girls in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- A cross-sectional study of parental perspectives on children about COVID-19 and classification using machine learning models.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Data altruism and the "consent" question: a study into the "consent" models used under the GDPR and how the data altruism mechanism can act as a potential solution for the research community in the reuse of health data.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Evidence-Based Decision Making 3: Health Technology Assessment.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- HTA for pharmaceuticals in Europe: will the mountain deliver a mouse?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020Article
- Health technology assessment for pharmaceutical regulation in the European Union: do we need another body?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020Article
- Evaluation of Ethical Analyses in Seven Reports from the European Network for Health Technology Assessment.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2019Article
- Bioethics: a challenge and an opportunity for hospital pharmacists.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019Article
- Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2018Article
- Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments.GMS health technology assessment · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown.
methodsSix of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors' experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches.
resultsThe Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach.
conclusionThis study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.