Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004726›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2016

A new trial design to accelerate tuberculosis drug development: the Phase IIC Selection Trial with Extended Post-treatment follow-up (STEP).

Patrick P J Phillips, Kelly E Dooley, Stephen H Gillespie, Norbert Heinrich, Jason E Stout, Payam Nahid, Andreas H Diacon, Rob E Aarnoutse, Gibson S Kibiki, Martin J Boeree and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. REVOLUTIONIZING TUBERCULOSIS REGIMEN DEVELOPMENT.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New and Repurposed Drugs for the Treatment of Active Tuberculosis: An Update for Clinicians.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. UNITE4TB: a new consortium for clinical drug and regimen development for TB.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Management of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Patrick P J PhillipsMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK. patrick.phillips@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-7024
Kelly E DooleySchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Stephen H GillespieSchool of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK.
Norbert HeinrichDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Center of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Jason E StoutSchool of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Payam NahidUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Andreas H DiaconDivision of Physiology, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Rob E AarnoutseDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gibson S KibikiEast African Health Research Commission (EAHRC), East African Community, Arusha, Tanzania.
Martin J BoereeDepartment of Lung Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, UCCZ Dekkerswald, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Michael HoelscherDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Center of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLDuke University · USEast, Central and Southern Africa Health Community · TZJohns Hopkins University · USMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Clinical Pharmacology Training ProgramT32GM066691 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Michael Ippolito · 2003 to 2026
$6.4M
TB Surrogate Markers for Assessing Reponse to Treatment (TB SMART Study)R01AI104589 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI NAHID, PAYAM, SIGAL, GEORGE B · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
Integrative Pharmacology Approach to Understand Mechanisms of TB Drug ResistanceR01AI111992 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DOOLEY, KELLY E., NUERMBERGER, ERIC L · 2014 to 2018
$3.5M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/27NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI104589NIAID NIH HHS R01AI104589NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111992NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe standard 6-month four-drug regimen for the treatment of drug-sensitive tuberculosis has remained unchanged for decades and is inadequate to control the epidemic. Shorter, simpler regimens are urgently needed to defeat what is now the world's greatest infectious disease killer.

methodsWe describe the Phase IIC Selection Trial with Extended Post-treatment follow-up (STEP) as a novel hybrid phase II/III trial design to accelerate regimen development. In the Phase IIC STEP trial, the experimental regimen is given for the duration for which it will be studied in phase III (presently 3 or 4 months) and patients are followed for clinical outcomes of treatment failure and relapse for a total of 12 months from randomisation. Operating characteristics of the trial design are explored assuming a classical frequentist framework as well as a Bayesian framework with flat and sceptical priors. A simulation study is conducted using data from the RIFAQUIN phase III trial to illustrate how such a design could be used in practice.

resultsWith 80 patients per arm, and two (2.5 %) unfavourable outcomes in the STEP trial, there is a probability of 0.99 that the proportion of unfavourable outcomes in a potential phase III trial would be less than 12 % and a probability of 0.91 that the proportion of unfavourable outcomes would be less than 8 %. With six (7.5 %) unfavourable outcomes, there is a probability of 0.82 that the proportion of unfavourable outcomes in a potential phase III trial would be less than 12 % and a probability of 0.41 that it would be less than 8 %. Simulations using data from the RIFAQUIN trial show that a STEP trial with 80 patients per arm would have correctly shown that the Inferior Regimen should not proceed to phase III and would have had a high chance (0.88) of either showing that the Successful Regimen could proceed to phase III or that it might require further optimisation.

conclusionsCollection of definitive clinical outcome data in a relatively small number of participants over only 12 months provides valuable information about the likelihood of success in a future phase III trial. We strongly believe that the STEP trial design described herein is an important tool that would allow for more informed decision-making and accelerate regimen development.

Indexed as

Research DesignBayes TheoremDrug DiscoveryFemaleHumansTuberculosisClinical trialsDrug developmentMiddle developmentPhase IICRegimen developmentSTEPTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27004726
PMCPMC4804526
OpenAlexW2311799564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.