Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004714›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2016

New depression diagnosis following prescription of codeine, hydrocodone or oxycodone.

Jeffrey F Scherrer, Joanne Salas, Kathleen K Bucholz, F David Schneider, Thomas Burroughs, Laurel A Copeland, Mark D Sullivan, Patrick J Lustman

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Prescription Opioids and Depression Pathways Cohort Study.Journal of psychiatry and brain science · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Opioids and Chronic Pain: Where Is the Balance?Current oncology reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey F ScherrerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joanne SalasDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kathleen K BucholzDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
F David SchneiderDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas BurroughsSaint Louis University Center for Outcomes Research, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Laurel A CopelandCenter for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott & White Health, and Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, USA.
Mark D SullivanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patrick J LustmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Saint Louis University · USHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · USJohn Cochran VA Medical Center · USSt Louis Community College · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Washington · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Prescription Opioid Analgesics and Risk of Major DepressionR21MH101389 · NIMH · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHERRER, JEFFREY F. · 2014 to 2015
$392k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH101389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLonger duration of prescription opioid use is associated with risk of major depression after controlling for daily morphine equivalent dose and pain. It is not known if risk of depression varies as a function of the type of opioid prescribed.

methodsA retrospective cohort design was used to model onset of new depression diagnosis among 11 462 Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients who were prescribed only codeine, only hydrocodone or only oxycodone for >30 days. Patients were free of prevalent opioid use and depression at baseline (2000-2001). Follow-up was 2002-2012. Propensity scores and weighting were used to balance covariates across opioid type. Cox-proportional hazard models were computed, using weighted data and additional adjustment for morphine equivalent dose (MED), duration of use, and pain after opioid initiation, to estimate the risk of new depression diagnosis among patients prescribed only codeine, only oxycodone vs. those prescribed only hydrocodone.

resultsAfter controlling for confounding, we observed that patients prescribed codeine, compared to hydrocodone, were significantly more likely to have a new depression diagnosis (HR = 1.27; 95%CI: 1.12-1.43). Oxycodone was significantly associated with onset of new depression diagnosis when exposure was modeled as total days exposed in post-hoc analysis, but not when exposure was duration of incident period of use.

conclusionsAlthough codeine is a less potent opioid, after controlling for MED, chronic use of this agent is associated with nearly a 30% greater risk of depression compared to hydrocodone. Additional research is needed to determine the mechanisms for this association. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCodeineCohort StudiesDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrocodoneMaleMiddle AgedOxycodoneProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAnalgesics, OpioidCodeineHydrocodoneOxycodonedepressionepidemiologyopioidspharmacoepidemiologyretrospective cohort

Identifiers

PMID27004714
PMCPMC4904297
OpenAlexW2311575235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.