Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004612›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Immunogenicity of a Trivalent Recombinant Vaccine Against Clostridium perfringens Alpha, Beta, and Epsilon Toxins in Farm Ruminants.

Gustavo Marçal Schmidt Garcia Moreira, Felipe Masiero Salvarani, Carlos Eduardo Pouey da Cunha, Marcelo Mendonça, Ângela Nunes Moreira, Luciana Aramuni Gonçalves, Prhiscylla Sadanã Pires, Francisco Carlos Faria Lobato, Fabricio Rochedo Conceição

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Design of a chitosan-based nano vaccine against epsilon toxin ofResearch in pharmaceutical sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vaccination against pathogenic clostridia in animals: a review.Tropical animal health and production · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. NPJ vaccines · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo Marçal Schmidt Garcia MoreiraCentro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 96160-000, Brazil.
Felipe Masiero SalvaraniInstituto de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Pará, Castanhal, Pará, CEP 68740-970, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Pouey da CunhaCentro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 96160-000, Brazil.
Marcelo MendonçaCentro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 96160-000, Brazil.
Ângela Nunes MoreiraFaculdade de Nutrição, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 96010-610, Brazil.
Luciana Aramuni GonçalvesEscola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
Prhiscylla Sadanã PiresEscola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
Francisco Carlos Faria LobatoEscola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, CEP 30123-970, Brazil.
Fabricio Rochedo ConceiçãoCentro de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, CEP 96160-000, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridium perfringens is an anaerobic bacterium that produces several toxins. Of these, the alpha, beta, and epsilon toxins are responsible for causing the most severe C. perfringens-related diseases in farm animals. The best way to control these diseases is through vaccination. However, commercially available vaccines are based on inactivated toxins and have many production drawbacks, which can be overcome through the use of recombinant antigens. In this study, we produced recombinant alpha, beta, and epsilon toxins in Escherichia coli to formulate a trivalent vaccine. Its effectiveness was evaluated through a potency test in rabbits, in which the vaccine generated 9.6, 24.4, and 25.0 IU/mL of neutralizing antibodies against the respective toxins. Following this, cattle, sheep, and goats received the same formulation, generating, respectively, 5.19 ± 0.48, 4.34 ± 0.43, and 4.70 ± 0.58 IU/mL against alpha toxin, 13.71 ± 1.17 IU/mL (for all three species) against beta toxin, and 12.74 ± 1.70, 7.66 ± 1.69, and 8.91 ± 2.14 IU/mL against epsilon toxin. These levels were above the minimum recommended by international protocols. As such, our vaccine was effective in generating protective antibodies and, thus, may represent an interesting alternative for the prevention of C. perfringens-related intoxications in farm animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingBacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesCalcium-Binding ProteinsCattleCattle DiseasesClostridium InfectionsClostridium perfringensFemaleGoat DiseasesGoatsRabbitsRecombinant ProteinsSheepalpha toxin, Clostridium perfringensAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingBacterial ToxinsBacterial VaccinesCalcium-Binding ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsType C Phospholipases

Identifiers

PMID27004612
PMCPMC4804304
OpenAlexW2303160425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.