Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004525›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

Genome-wide analysis of ionotropic receptors provides insight into their evolution in Heliconius butterflies.

Bas van Schooten, Chris D Jiggins, Adriana D Briscoe, Riccardo Papa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noses on the wing: the olfactory capacity of hawkmoth wings.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Genome-Wide Identification and Evolutionary Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Divergence of chemosensing during the early stages of speciation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bas van SchootenDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico. basvanschooten@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4673-4168
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Adriana D BriscoeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Riccardo PapaDepartment of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PRUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY & EDUCATION CORE (STCE)P20GM103475 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Humberto Guillermo Ortiz-Zuazaga · 2012 to 2026
$52.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a world of chemical cues, smell and taste are essential senses for survival. Here we focused on Heliconius, a diverse group of butterflies that exhibit variation in pre- and post-zygotic isolation and chemically-mediated behaviors across their phylogeny. Our study examined the ionotropic receptors, a recently discovered class of receptors that are some of the most ancient chemical receptors.

resultsWe found more ionotropic receptors in Heliconius (31) than in Bombyx mori (25) or in Danaus plexippus (27). Sixteen genes in Lepidoptera were not present in Diptera. Only IR7d4 was exclusively found in butterflies and two expansions of IR60a were exclusive to Heliconius. A genome-wide comparison between 11 Heliconius species revealed instances of pseudogenization, gene gain, and signatures of positive selection across the phylogeny. IR60a2b and IR60a2d are unique to the H. melpomene, H. cydno, and H. timareta clade, a group where chemosensing is likely involved in pre-zygotic isolation. IR60a2b also displayed copy number variations (CNVs) in distinct populations of H. melpomene and was the only gene significantly higher expressed in legs and mouthparts than in antennae, which suggests a gustatory function. dN/dS analysis suggests more frequent positive selection in some intronless IR genes and in particular in the sara/sapho and melpomene/cydno/timareta clades. IR60a1 was the only gene with an elevated dN/dS along a major phylogenetic branch associated with pupal mating. Only IR93a was differentially expressed between sexes.

conclusionsAll together these data make Heliconius butterflies one of the very few insects outside Drosophila where IRs have been characterized in detail. Our work outlines a dynamic pattern of IR gene evolution throughout the Heliconius radiation which could be the result of selective pressure to find potential mates or host-plants.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenes, InsectAnimalsButterfliesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleMalePhylogenyReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateSelection, GeneticReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateButterflyChemosensory receptorsGustationLepidopteraOlfactionSmellSpeciationTaste

Identifiers

PMID27004525
PMCPMC4804616
OpenAlexW2298892451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.