Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004517›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Kate Fullarton, Danielle Lamb, Elaine Johnston, Steve Onyett, David Osborn, Gareth Ambler, Louise Marston, Rachael Hunter, Oliver Mason and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. b.lloyd-evans@ucl.ac.uk.
Kate FullartonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Danielle LambDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Elaine JohnstonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Steve OnyettOnyett Entero Ltd, Care of University of the West of England, Health and Life Sciences Coldharbour Ln, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
David OsbornDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Gareth AmblerDepartment of Statistical Science, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Louise MarstonDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Rachael HunterDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School (Royal Free Campus), Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Oliver MasonDepartment of Clinical Education and Health Psychology, UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Claire HendersonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
Nicky GoaterWest London Mental Health NHS Trust, Uxbridge Road, Southall, London, UB1 3EU, UK.
Sarah A SullivanEpidemiology and Health Services Research, CLAHRC West, Lewins Mead, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.
Kathleen KellyOxfordshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Barnes Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Richard GrayMental Health Sciences, University of the West of England, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
Fiona NolanCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Division of Psychology and language Sciences, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Stephen PillingCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Division of Psychology and language Sciences, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Gary BondDepartment of Psychiatry, Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Centre, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity of the West of England · GBDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBRoland Hill (United Kingdom) · GBWest London Mental Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0109-10078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs an alternative to hospital admission, crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crises. Trial evidence supports the effectiveness of the CRT model, but research suggests that the anticipated reductions in inpatient admissions and increased user satisfaction with acute care have been less than hoped for following the scaling up of CRTs nationally in England, as mandated by the National Health Service (NHS) Plan in 2000. The organisation and service delivery of the CRTs vary substantially. This may reflect the lack of a fully specified CRT model and the resources to enhance team model fidelity and to improve service quality. We will evaluate the impact of a CRT service improvement programme over a 1-year period on the service users' experiences of care, service use, staff well-being, and team model fidelity. METHODS/

designTwenty-five CRTs from eight NHS Trusts across England will be recruited to this cluster-randomised trial: 15 CRTs will be randomised to receive the service improvement programme over a 1-year period, and ten CRTs will not receive the programme. Data will be collected from 15 service users and all clinical staff from each participating CRT at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Service use data will be collected from the services' electronic records systems for two 6-month periods: the period preceding and the period during months 7-12 of the intervention. The study's primary outcome is service user satisfaction with CRT care, measured using a client satisfaction questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the following: perceived continuity of care, hospital admission rates and bed use, rates of readmission to acute care following CRT support, staff morale, job satisfaction, and general health. The adherence of the services to a model of best practice will be assessed at baseline and follow-up. Outcomes will be compared between the intervention and control teams, adjusting for baseline differences and participant characteristics using linear random effects modelling. Qualitative investigations with participating CRT managers and staff and programme facilitators will explore the experiences of the service improvement programme. DISCUSSION: Our trial will show whether a theoretically underpinned and clearly defined package of resources are effective in supporting service improvement and improving outcomes for mental health crisis resolution teams.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN47185233.

Indexed as

Crisis InterventionHome Care ServicesMental Health ServicesPatient Care TeamClinical ProtocolsCluster AnalysisDelivery of Health CareEnglandHumansMental DisordersMental HealthPatient SatisfactionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareResearch DesignAcute careCrisis resolution teamsRandomised controlled trialService improvement

Identifiers

PMID27004517
PMCPMC4804533
OpenAlexW2308498712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.