Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004426›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2016

Male patients require higher optimal effect-site concentrations of propofol during i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg.

Jung Ju Choi, Ji Young Kim, Dongchul Lee, Young Jin Chang, Noo Ree Cho, Hyun Jeong Kwak

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02268656 (Preducted Effect-site Concentration of Propofol for I-gel Insertion During Anesthesia Induction), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02268656 nacompletednot on this map

Preducted Effect-site Concentration of Propofol for I-gel Insertion During Anesthesia Induction

TypeinterventionalSponsorGachon University Gil Medical CenterRan2014 to 2015Enrolled40ConditionsIgelArmspropofol concentration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dexmedetomidine reduces sevoflurane ECTherapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jung Ju ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
Ji Young KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dongchul LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
Young Jin ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
Noo Ree ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jeong KwakDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, Republic of Korea. hyun615@gilhospital.com.
Gachon University Gil Medical Center · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of an anesthetic drug may be influenced by gender. The purpose of this study was to compare effect-site half maximal effective concentrations (EC50) of propofol in male and female patients during i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg without muscle relaxants.

methodsForty patients, aged 20-46 years of ASA physical status I or II, were allocated to one of two groups by gender (20 patients per group). After the infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg over 2 min, anesthesia was induced with a pre-determined effect-site concentration of propofol by target controlled infusion. Effect-site EC50 values of propofol for successful i-gel insertion were determined using the modified Dixon's up-and-down method.

resultsMean effect-site EC50 ± SD of propofol for successful i-gel insertion was significantly higher for men than women (5.46 ± 0.26 μg/ml vs. 3.82 ± 0.34 μg/ml, p < 0.01). The EC50 of propofol in men was approximately 40% higher than in women. Using isotonic regression with a bootstrapping approach, the estimated EC50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol was also higher in men [5.32 (4.45-6.20) μg/ml vs. 3.75 (3.05-4.43) μg/ml]. The estimated EC95 (95% confidence interval) of propofol in men and women were 5.93 (4.72-6.88) μg/ml and 4.52 (3.02-5.70) μg/ml, respectively.

conclusionsDuring i-gel insertion with dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg without muscle relaxant, male patients had higher effect-site EC50 for propofol using Schnider's model. Based on the results of this study, patient gender should be considered when determining the optimal dose of propofol during supraglottic airway insertion.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02268656. Registered August 26, 2014.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, IntravenousDexmedetomidineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPropofolYoung AdultAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, IntravenousDexmedetomidinePropofolDexmedetomidineI-gelPropofol

Identifiers

PMID27004426
PMCPMC4804608
OpenAlexW2309221082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.