Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004249›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2016

Hill classification is superior to the axial length of a hiatal hernia for assessment of the mechanical anti-reflux barrier at the gastroesophageal junction.

Ida Hansdotter, Ove Björ, Anna Andreasson, Lars Agreus, Per Hellström, Anna Forsberg, Nicholas J Talley, Michael Vieth, Bengt Wallner

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03548298 nacompletednot on this map

Antireflux Ablation Therapy (ARAT) With Hybrid-APC (Argon Plasma Coagulation) for GERD Treatment in Patients Without Hiatal Hernia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCoordinación de Investigación en Salud, MexicoRan2016 to 2019Enrolled95ConditionsGastro Esophageal RefluxArmsARAT
NCT05330910 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating PAtients With Lax Gastroesophageal Junction to Initial Sleeve Gastrectomy With or Without Concomitant Crural Repair (REPAIR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSengkang General HospitalRan2022 to 2028Enrolled96ConditionsObesity, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Esophagus Injury, Gastroesophageal RefluxArmsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with concomitant hiatal hernia repair arm, Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Postoperative quality of life after minimally invasive repair of giant hiatal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. What is the significance of the Hill classification?Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Role of Endoscopy in Motility Disorders of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ida HansdotterDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Ove BjörDepartment of Radiation Science, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anna AndreassonDivision of Family Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden; Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars AgreusStress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per HellströmUppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna ForsbergMolecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Nicholas J TalleyFaculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Michael ViethInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Bengt WallnerDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SEStockholm University · SEBayreuth Medical Center · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsThe pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial, including the mechanical anti-reflux barrier of the gastroesophageal junction. This barrier can be evaluated endoscopically in two ways: by measuring the axial length of any hiatal hernia present or by assessing the gastroesophageal flap valve. The endoscopic measurement of axial length is troublesome because of the physiological dynamics in the area. Grading the gastroesophageal flap valve is easier and has proven reproducible. The aim of the present study was to compare the two endoscopic grading methods with regard to associations with GERD. PATIENTS AND

methodsPopulation-based subjects underwent endoscopic examination assessing the axial length of hiatus hernia, the gastroesophageal flap valve using the Hill classification, esophagitis using the Los Angeles (LA) classification, and columnar metaplasia using the Z-line appearance (ZAP) classification. Biopsies were taken from the squamocolumnar junction to assess the presence of intestinal metaplasia. Symptoms were recorded with the validated Abdominal Symptom Questionnaire. GERD was defined according to the Montreal definition.

resultsIn total, 334 subjects were included in the study and underwent endoscopy; 86 subjects suffered from GERD and 211 presented no symptoms or signs of GERD. Based on logistic regression, the estimated area under the curve statistic (AUC) for Hill (0.65 [95 %CI 0.59 - 0.72]) was higher than the corresponding estimate for the axial length of a hiatal hernia (0.61 [95 %CI 0.54 - 0.68]), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.225).

conclusionFrom our data, and in terms of association with GERD, the Hill classification was slightly stronger compared to the axial length of a hiatal hernia, but we could not verify that the Hill classification was superior as a predictor. The Hill classification may replace the axial length of a hiatal hernia in the endoscopic assessment of the mechanical anti-reflux barrier of the gastroesophageal junction.

Identifiers

PMID27004249
PMCPMC4798936
OpenAlexW2296912845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.