ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2016
Clocks within Clocks: Timing by Coincidence Detection.
Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 4096 channel event-based multielectrode array with asynchronous outputs compatible with neuromorphic processors.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Neural Sequences and the Encoding of Time.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- The future of integrative neuroscience: The big questions.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Article
- Is the scalar property of interval timing preserved after hippocampus lesions?Journal of theoretical biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Internal-Clock Models and Misguided Views of Mechanistic Explanations: A Reply to Eckard & Lattal (2020).Perspectives on behavior science · 2020Article
- Periodicity Pitch Perception.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Internal Clocks, mGluR7 and Microtubules: A Primer for the Molecular Encoding of Target Durations in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neural Correlates of Interval Timing Deficits in Schizophrenia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
- Scalar timing in memory: A temporal map in the hippocampus.Journal of theoretical biology · 2018Article
- A Population-Based Model of the Temporal Memory in the Hippocampus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Inactivation of the Medial-Prefrontal Cortex Impairs Interval Timing Precision, but Not Timing Accuracy or Scalar Timing in a Peak-Interval Procedure in Rats.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2018Article
- Biological and Cognitive Frameworks for a Mental Timeline.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Short-term memory for spatial, sequential and duration information.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017Review
- Increased temporal discounting after chronic stress in CHL1-deficient mice is reversed by 5-HT2C agonist Ro 60-0175.Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Sex differences in interval timing and attention to time in C57Bl/6J mice.Behavioural brain research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The many existent models of timing rely on vastly different mechanisms to track temporal information. Here we examine these differences, and identify coincidence detection in its most general form as a common mechanism that many apparently different timing models share, as well as a common mechanism of biological circadian, millisecond and interval timing. This view predicts that timing by coincidence detection is a ubiquitous phenomenon at many biological levels, explains the reports of biological timing in many brain areas, explains the role of neural noise at different time scales at both biological and theoretical levels, and provides cohesion within the timing field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.