Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27004221›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2016

Toxicity and early outcomes of regorafenib in multiply pre-treated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma-experience from a tertiary cancer centre in India.

Saurabh Zanwar, Vikas Ostwal, Sudeep Gupta, Bhawna Sirohi, Anup Toshniwal, Nitin Shetty, Shripad Banavali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saurabh Zanwar1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Vikas Ostwal1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Sudeep Gupta1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Bhawna Sirohi1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Anup Toshniwal1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Nitin Shetty1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Shripad Banavali1 Department of Medical Oncology, TMH, Mumbai, India ; 2 Head Medical Oncology, NH health city, Banglore, India ; 3 Department of Interventional Radiology, TMH, Mumbai, India.
Nightingales Medical Trust · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor (MKI) approved for use in multiply pre-treated metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of regorafenib from India. MATERIALS AND

methodsRecords of 23 cases treated with regorafenib at our centre between June 2013 till September 2015 were reviewed. All had received at least two non cross resistant lines of therapy prior to regorafenib. Toxicity was recorded using CTCAE version 4.03. Responses were assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Response evaluation was done every three months or earlier if clinically indicated. Five patients were still on therapy at the time of this report.

resultsThe median age was 50 years. Thirty-nine percent (9/23) had upfront metastatic disease. Twenty-six percent (6/23) and 39% (9/23) patients had received prior treatment with cetuximab and bevacizumab respectively. Mean duration of regorafenib treatment was 3.8 months. At least one grade III/IV toxicity was noted in 65% (15/23) cases. The most common were handfoot syndrome (HFS) and fatigue seen in 86.9% (20/23) patients. Grade II and III HFS was seen in 65% patients. One patient required stoppage of treatment due to grade III hepatotoxicity. Dose reduction was required for 86.9% (20/23) patients. Best response noted was stable disease in 34.8% (8/23), partial response in 8.7% (2/23) patients and progression in 56.5% (13/23). Median progression free survival was 3 months and median follow-up was 4.5 months.

conclusionsRegorafenib, although an effective treatment strategy in multiply pre-treated mCRC, is associated with significant side effects.

Indexed as

handfoot syndrome (HFS)hypertensionmetastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC)Regorafenib

Identifiers

PMID27004221
PMCPMC4779767
OpenAlexW2309178445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.