Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003666›Full record

ReviewJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016

New Therapeutic Paradigms and Guidelines in the Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Nicholas S Hill, Michael J Cawley, Cherilyn L Heggen-Peay

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicholas S Hill
Michael J Cawley
Cherilyn L Heggen-Peay

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent and ongoing developments in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) provide deeper insights into pathogenic mechanisms. Approvals of new pharmacotherapies that improve function and reduce morbidity and mortality risks; advances in clinical trial methods, including long-term, event-driven studies with clinically relevant and patient-centered endpoints; and trial results support a new therapeutic management strategy. This new paradigm involves initial treatment with combined therapies that act through different disease pathways. In addition, 2 new sets of clinical practice guidelines for PAH have been published since June 2014. Despite these advances, major gaps have been documented in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with PAH.

objectiveTo present current knowledge and evidence on PAH to support managed care professionals and providers in achieving accurate differential diagnosis, promptly referring patients to specialists as necessary, and ensuring that patients receive appropriate, guideline-directed therapies. SUMMARY: Major gaps in the quality of care provided to patients with PAH include oversights in clinicians' recognition of symptoms, delays in diagnosis, and misdiagnosis ensuing from incomplete evaluations, delays in referral of patients to centers of expertise and initiation of therapy, and inappropriate treatment regimens. To address deficiencies in PAH diagnosis, new practice guidelines emphasize the essential role of right heart catheterization in characterizing and confirming the disease, as well as referral to expert pulmonary hypertension centers to ensure appropriate evaluation and treatment. Updated disease and functional classifications of PAH, along with new research findings on prognostic factors and effects of comorbid conditions, offer key support for making effective therapy and management decisions for patients with PAH at different risk levels and stages of the disease. Since 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved new PAH therapies in the classes of endothelin receptor antagonists, guanylate cyclase stimulators, prostacyclin analogues, and prostacyclin receptor agonists. As demonstrated through phase 3 clinical trials, these generally well-tolerated therapies delay disease progression, improve hemodynamic and functional status, and decrease numbers of hospitalizations. Moreover, 2 sets of recently published guidelines-developed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society-provide evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations for achieving PAH treatment goals. The most recent guidelines include a recommendation for upfront combination therapy for patients with moderate disease, which is supported by new comparative clinical trial evidence. As addressed in this article, these advances in the field of PAH have important implications for managed care and clinical practice, including considerations of cost-benefit outcomes associated with different management strategies.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDisease ManagementDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansHypertension, PulmonaryPrognosisUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID27003666
PMCPMC10408430
OpenAlexW2287048942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.