ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016
Evaluating the Initiation of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Beneficiaries.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Racial and ethnic disparities in arrhythmia care: A call for action.Heart rhythm · 2022Guideline
- Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Association of Race/Ethnicity With Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Findings From the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II.JAMA cardiology · 2018Trial
- Optimizing blood pressure control in multimorbid hypertensive patients: insights from a real-world taiwanese cohort.Journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- A qualitative crossroads of rhythm and race: Black patients' experiences living with atrial fibrillation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Racial and sex differences in optimizing anticoagulation therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Prevalence of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Among Baltimore City Adults in the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity Across the Life Span (HANDLS) Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2022Article
- Comparison of oral anticoagulation use and adherence among Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in stand-alone prescription drug plans vs Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2022Article
- Racial and Ethnic Considerations in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: JACC Focus Seminar 5/9.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021Review
- Review
- Patient Perspectives on Factors Affecting Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Trajectories of Oral Anticoagulation Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries Newly Diagnosed With Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
- Factors affecting general practitioners' decisions to adopt new prescription drugs - cohort analyses using Australian longitudinal physician survey data.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Patients' Priorities for Oral Anticoagulation Therapy in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation: a Multi-criteria Decision Analysis.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2018Article
- Risk factors for stroke and choice of oral anticoagulant in atrial fibrillation.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Article
- Trends and Variation in Oral Anticoagulant Choice in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, 2010-2017.Pharmacotherapy · 2018Article
- Contemporary utilization of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: an audit in an Australian hospital setting.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2018Article
- Medicare part D prescribing for direct oral anticoagulants in the United States: Cost, use and the "rubber effect".PloS one · 2018Article
- Trends in the prescription of novel oral anticoagulants in UK primary care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Management of oral antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation therapy before bronchoscopy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs alternatives to warfarin, 2 novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), dabigatran and rivaroxaban, were approved in 2010 and 2011 to prevent stroke and other thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. It is unclear how patient characteristics are associated with the initiation of anticoagulants.
objectiveTo evaluate how patient demographics, clinical characteristics, types of insurance, and patient out-of-pocket spending affect the initiation of warfarin and 2 NOACs--dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
methodsWe used pharmacy claims data from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries to identify patients who were newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation between October 1, 2010, and October 31, 2012, and who were prescribed an oral anticoagulant within 60 days of diagnosis. We identified key predictors of initiation of NOACs using a multinomial logistic regression model with generalized logit link.
resultsPatients who were black and who had a history of acute myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack, chronic kidney disease, or congestive heart failure were significantly associated with lower odds of receiving NOACs compared with warfarin. Age greater than 65 years, a history of hypertension, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were positively associated with the initiation of NOACs. Rivaroxaban was most likely to be initiated among women, followed by warfarin and dabigatran. Individuals receiving a low-income subsidy were more likely to initiate warfarin than NOACs, even though they paid little copayment. Individuals with supplemental Part D drug coverage, such as national Programs for All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly or employer-sponsored plans, were more likely to initiate NOACs compared with warfarin.
conclusionsWe found that race, sex, type of Part D plans, and some clinical conditions were associated with the initiation of NOACs relative to warfarin. But patient demographic and clinical characteristics did not appear to affect which particular NOAC patients initiated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.