Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003550›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016

Primary Nonadherence, Associated Clinical Outcomes, and Health Care Resource Use Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Prescribed Treatment with Injectable Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs.

James Harnett, Daniel Wiederkehr, Robert Gerber, David Gruben, Jeffrey Bourret, Andrew Koenig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Not obtaining a medication the first time it is prescribed: primary non-adherence to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James Harnett1 Senior Director, Real World Data and Analytics, Worldwide Policy, Pfizer, New York, New York.
Daniel Wiederkehr2 Director, Worldwide Policy, Pfizer, New York, New York.
Robert Gerber3 Senior Director, Outcomes and Evidence, Statistics, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut.
David Gruben4 Senior Director, Statistics, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut.
Jeffrey Bourret5 Senior Director, North America Medical Affairs, Pfizer, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Andrew Koenig5 Senior Director, North America Medical Affairs, Pfizer, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is often suboptimal in routine clinical practice. Low or nonadherence can reduce the effectiveness of bDMARD therapies.

objectiveTo evaluate filling of newly prescribed initial bDMARDs for the treatment of RA and evaluate potential for characterizing treatment decisions and patient outcomes.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort analysis, patients aged ≥ 18 years with an RA diagnosis (ICD-9-CM code 714.xx) were selected from a de-identified database of clinical information from the Electronic Health Record (EHR; Humedica) database linked to health care claims (Optum) from commercial and Medicare Advantage health plans (2007-2013). The first biologic prescription date in EHR was the index date. Patients were categorized as filling the prescription within 30 days (early fillers), 31-180 days (late fillers), or not at all within 180 days (nonfillers) of index date.

resultsOf 373 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 170 (45.6%), 59 (15.8%), and 144 (38.6%) were categorized as early fillers, late fillers, and nonfillers, respectively. Most prescriptions were written or ordered for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (88.7%). Compared with late and nonfillers, early fillers were younger and more likely to be female, with higher pain scores (among those reporting pain scores) and RA severity scores pre-index, and filled more prescriptions for any reason pre-index. More nonfillers (66.0%) were Medicare patients than early (17.7%) and late (35.6%) fillers. During days 0-30 post-index, conventional synthetic DMARD use was greatest for early fillers (45.9%) and lowest among nonfillers (24.3%); however, during days 31-180 post-index, the proportion was highest for late fillers (61.0%) and lowest for nonfillers (35.4%). Of early fillers, 12.9% did not fill/receive a bDMARD after 30 days. Only 23 patients had pre/post-index pain scores, and 47 patients had a rationale for stopping or not filling a bDMARD. In patients with pharmacy and medical coverage for 180 days post-index, early fillers had greater RA-related pharmacy and medical resource use and costs than late and nonfillers combined.

conclusionsThese findings confirm a high rate of primary nonadherence to bDMARDs among patients with RA.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansInjectionsMaleMedicareMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrescription DrugsRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID27003550
PMCPMC10403817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.