Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003549›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016

Using an Electronic Medication Refill System to Improve Provider Productivity in an Accountable Care Setting.

Robert Schoenhaus, Adam Lustig, Silvia Rivas, Victor Monrreal, Kimberly D Westrich, Robert W Dubois

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Association of physician burnout with perceived EHR work stress and potentially actionable factors.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Why do we need pharmacists in pharmacovigilance systems?Online journal of public health informatics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert Schoenhaus1 Director, Pharmacy Benefits Administration, Ambulatory Care, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Centers, San Diego, California.
Adam Lustig2 Research Manager, National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC.
Silvia Rivas3 Clinical Supervisor, Pharmacy Benefits Administration, Ambulatory Care, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Centers, San Diego, California.
Victor Monrreal4 Clinical Pharmacist, Ambulatory Care, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Centers, San Diego, California.
Kimberly D Westrich5 Vice President, Health Services Research, National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC.
Robert W Dubois6 Chief Science Officer, National Pharmaceutical Council, Washington, DC.
National Health Council · USSharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven within fully integrated health care systems, primary care providers (PCPs) often lack support for medication management. Because challenges with conducting medication reconciliation, improving adherence, and achieving optimal patient outcomes continue to be prevalent nationally, it is critical that PCPs are provided the resources and support they need to provide high-quality, patient-centered care in an accountable care environment. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group uses a fully electronic medication refill system that allows for a centralized team to manage all incoming requests. Over time, 16 disease-specific protocols were created that allowed the pharmacy team to absorb approximately 80% of incoming refill requests for all enrolled PCPs. The refill clinic assessed all clinic information that a PCP would normally review in order to approve a refill. Tasks performed by the clinical pharmacists included medication reconciliation, dosage adjustment, and coordination of distribution from external mail order and retail pharmacies. OBSERVATIONS: In 2014, the number of tasks related to refill management reviewed by the refill/medication therapy management service totaled 302,592, resulting in 140,350 refill authorizations and multiple interventions related to medication use. Physicians have estimated that the service provides between 20 and 30 minutes of time savings per day. Assuming an annual PCP salary of around $200,000, 20 to 30 minutes per day would amount to $33 to $50 saved per day per physician. The savings is even higher when time savings from other clinical staff is included. IMPLICATIONS: The development of this electronic medication refill service has provided the following important lessons: (a) organizations rely on a leader or champion to push through process reforms--this program started with reluctant physicians first to determine best practices; (b) the lack of clinical pharmacist profiles within electronic health records (EHR) is a serious concern, since the creation of these profiles may not be easy or timely; and (c) PCPs working within an EHR environment will quickly embrace the idea of a service that can save them up to 30 minutes per day. With PCPs continuing to take on additional population health management tasks in accountable care organizations, pharmacists can provide workload offsets by meaningfully contributing to medication-related care.

Indexed as

Electronic PrescribingPharmaceutical ServicesAccountable Care OrganizationsDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedElectronic Health RecordsHumansMedication Therapy ManagementPharmacistsPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID27003549
PMCPMC10397910
OpenAlexW2275199783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.