Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003406›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2016

Identification of Hepatozoon erhardovae Krampitz, 1964 from bank voles (Myodes glareolus) and fleas in Southern Hungary.

Krisztina Rigó, Gábor Majoros, Sándor Szekeres, Imola Molnár, Mónika Jablonszky, Viktória Majláthová, Igor Majláth, Gábor Földvári

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular detection and phylogeny ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Tropism ofViruses · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. First Record ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  9. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Krisztina RigóDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, 2 István Str. H-1078, Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor MajorosDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, 2 István Str. H-1078, Budapest, Hungary.
Sándor SzekeresDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, 2 István Str. H-1078, Budapest, Hungary.
Imola MolnárHungarian Department of Biology and Geology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Babes-Bolyai University, 5-7 Clinicilor Str., Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mónika JablonszkyDepartment of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Viktória MajláthováParasitological Institute SAS, Hlinkova 3, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
Igor MajláthInstitute of Biology and Ecology, University of P.J. Šafárik, Šrobárova 2, 041 80, Košice, Slovakia.
Gábor FöldváriDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Szent István University, 2 István Str. H-1078, Budapest, Hungary. FoldvariGabor@gmx.de.
Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUBabeș-Bolyai University · ROEötvös Loránd University · HUInstitute of Parasitology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to investigate the prevalence and life cycle of apicomplexan parasites, small mammals were live-trapped with modified Sherman traps in Southern Hungary between 2010 and 2012. Altogether, 528 rodents (Apodemus flavicollis Melchior, 1834, Apodemus agrarius Pallas, 1771, Myodes glareolus Schreber, 1780, Microtus agrestis Linnaeus, 1761, Mus musculus Linnaeus, 1758 and Micromys minutus Pallas, 1771) were collected and four shrews (Sorex spp.) were by-catched. Captured animals belonging to non-protected species were euthanized, and spleen samples were preserved for histological and molecular analyses. During the examination of spleen smears, Hepatozoon parasites were observed in eight out of 48 bank voles (M. glareolus). DNA was isolated from altogether 221 spleen samples, and 18S rDNA was amplified using two different PCR protocols. The eight bank vole samples were positive with PCR, but none of the other M. glareolus spleen samples or any of the tissue samples from other species were found to be infected. Sequenced amplicons were very similar to Hepatozoon spp. detected in M. glareolus in Spain and Poland. Ectoparasites were collected from the small mammal carcasses and from the vegetation. Hepatozoon DNA was not found in the 181 ticks removed from the small mammals or in the 162 ticks collected with flagging, but was detected in all three flea species (4/43 Megabothris turbidus Rothschild, 1909, 3/10 Ctenophthalmus assimilis Taschenberg, 1880 and 7/78 Ctenophthalmus agyrtes Heller, 1896). Based on gamont morphology, vertebrate and arthropod host species and DNA sequences, the parasites in our study can be identified as Hepatozoon erhardovae.

Indexed as

AnimalsArvicolinaeEucoccidiidaFlea InfestationsHungaryLife Cycle StagesPolandPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SShrewsSiphonapteraSpainTicksRNA, Ribosomal, 18SBank voleFleaHepatozoon erhardovaeHungaryMyodes glareolusRodent

Identifiers

PMID27003406
OpenAlexW2309269118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.