ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2016
Development of a new method for sampling and monitoring oncology staff exposed to cyclophosphamide drug.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of MIL-53(Al)-NHACS omega · 2022Article
- Cytostatics in Indoor Environment: An Update of Analytical Methods.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment using cytotoxic drugs is considered to be the most common treatment for cancers. However, the widespread use of these drugs on the health status of the staff at the oncology department has become a great concern. Due to challenges of sampling and analysis of cytotoxic drugs, the aim of this study was to development a novel practical method called Needle trap devices (NTD) for sampling and analysis of personal exposure to cyclophosphamide drug. The sampler consisted of a stainless steel hyper needle gauge 21 of length 9 cm packed with Carboxen 1000 for adsorbing cyclophosphamide. A total of 41 samples of staff's air breathing zone in different wards of the oncology department were taken with the sampler. Samples were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled with electron capture detector (ECD). Linear range concentration was 212-1062 μg/m(3), and LOD and LOQ were 100 and 191 μg/m(3), respectively. The mean inter-day and intra-day coefficient variations for standards within linear range concentration were 8.9 and 4.8 %, respectively. Detectable levels of cyclophosphamide were measured in 31.7 % of air samples. The developed method is user-friendly, quick, and precise for sampling of airborne cyclophosphamide. The results showed that some staff of the oncology department were exposed to the carcinogenic drug and their health were at risk. Since carcinogens do not have a threshold and oncology staffs with their continuous exposure might be at risk, therefore, proper work practice and adequate control measures are essential to ensure their wellbeing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.