Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003227›Full record

ReviewInvestigative radiology2016

Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Alice C Yang, Madison Kretzler, Sonja Sudarski, Vikas Gulani, Nicole Seiberlich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Investigative radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. AI-accelerated prostate MRI: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comprehensive review of artifacts in cardiac MRI and their mitigation.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice C YangFrom the Departments of *Biomedical Engineering and †Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; ‡Institute for Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; and §Department of Radiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH.
Madison Kretzler
Sonja Sudarski
Vikas Gulani
Nicole Seiberlich

Funding

Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
Improved Cardiac and Vascular MRI Using Parallel Imaging and Compressed SensingR01HL094557 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRISWOLD, MARK, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2010 to 2018
$4.5M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Optimization of MR Fingerprinting (MRF) for Quantitative MRIR01EB016728 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRISWOLD, MARK, GULANI, VIKAS · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL094557NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB016728NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The family of sparse reconstruction techniques, including the recently introduced compressed sensing framework, has been extensively explored to reduce scan times in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While there are many different methods that fall under the general umbrella of sparse reconstructions, they all rely on the idea that a priori information about the sparsity of MR images can be used to reconstruct full images from undersampled data. This review describes the basic ideas behind sparse reconstruction techniques, how they could be applied to improve MRI, and the open challenges to their general adoption in a clinical setting. The fundamental principles underlying different classes of sparse reconstructions techniques are examined, and the requirements that each make on the undersampled data outlined. Applications that could potentially benefit from the accelerations that sparse reconstructions could provide are described, and clinical studies using sparse reconstructions reviewed. Lastly, technical and clinical challenges to widespread implementation of sparse reconstruction techniques, including optimization, reconstruction times, artifact appearance, and comparison with current gold standards, are discussed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27003227
PMCPMC4948115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.