Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27003155›Full record

Trial reportVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2016

NGS-based BRCA1/2 mutation testing of high-grade serous ovarian cancer tissue: results and conclusions of the first international round robin trial.

Volker Endris, Albrecht Stenzinger, Nicole Pfarr, Roland Penzel, Markus Möbs, Dido Lenze, Silvia Darb-Esfahani, Michael Hummel, Sabine-Merkelbach-Bruse, Andreas Jung and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An optimizedJournal of gynecologic oncology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quality assurance trials for Ki67 assessment in pathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Volker EndrisInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany.
Albrecht StenzingerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany.
Nicole PfarrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roland PenzelInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus MöbsInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dido LenzeInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Silvia Darb-EsfahaniInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michael HummelInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine-Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas JungInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Ulrich LehmannInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Hans KreipeInstitute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas KirchnerInstitute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Reinhard BüttnerInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfram JochumInstitute of Pathology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Gerald HöflerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Manfred DietelInstitute of Pathology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Wilko WeichertInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter SchirmacherInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld, 224, Heidelberg, Germany. peter.schirmacher@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHeidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the approval of olaparib as monotherapy treatment in platinum-sensitive, relapsed high-grade serous ovarian cancer by the European Medical Agency (EMA), comprehensive genotyping of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in tumor tissue has become a mandatory pre-therapeutic test. This requires significant advances in routine tumor test methodologies due to the large size of both genes and the lack of mutational hot spots. Classical focused screening approaches, like Sanger sequencing, do not allow for a sensitive, rapid, and economic analysis of tumor tissue. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches employing targeted panels for BRCA1/2 to interrogate formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor samples from either surgical resection or biopsy specimens can overcome these limitations. Although focused NGS methods have been implemented by few centers in routine molecular diagnostics for the analysis of some druggable oncogenic mutations, the reliable diagnostic testing of the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 was a new challenge requiring extensive technological improvement and quality management. Here, we describe the implementation and results of the first round robin trial for BRCA1/2 mutation testing in tumor tissue that was conducted in central Europe on May 2015, shortly after the approval and prior to the official release of olaparib. The high success rate of 81 % (21/26 test centers) demonstrates that BRCA1/2 multicenter mutation testing is well feasible in FFPE tumor tissue, extending to other tumor entities beyond ovarian cancer. The high number of test centers passing the trial demonstrates the success of the concerted efforts by German, Swiss, and Austrian pathology centers to ensure quality-controlled NGS-based testing and proves the potential of this technology in routine molecular pathology. On the basis of our results, we provide recommendations for predictive testing of tumor tissue for BRCA1/2 to clinical decision making in ovarian cancer patients.

Indexed as

GenotypeAdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic TestingHumansMutationOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1BRCA2FFPENext-generation sequencingOlaparibOvarian cancerPARPTumor tissue

Identifiers

PMID27003155
OpenAlexW2310207516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.