Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27002930›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Maternal and infant outcomes among women vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy.

Abbey B Berenson, Jacqueline M Hirth, Mahbubur Rahman, Tabassum H Laz, Richard E Rupp, Kwabena O Sarpong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2018
    Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Safety and Clinical Benefits of AdacelInfectious diseases and therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The historical aspects of vaccination in pregnancy.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abbey B Berensona Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.
Jacqueline M Hirtha Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.
Mahbubur Rahmana Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.
Tabassum H Laza Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.
Richard E Ruppa Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.
Kwabena O Sarponga Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, University of Texas Medical Branch , Galveston , TX , USA.

Funding

UTMB WOMEN'S HEALTH RESEARCH SCHOLARS PROGRAMK12HD052023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI BERENSON, ABBEY B · 2005 to 2023
$8.1M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD052023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination is recommended for all women during each pregnancy to prevent pertussis in young infants. However, data on the safety of this protective measure are limited and conflicting. To assess maternal and infant outcomes associated with administration of this vaccine during pregnancy, we reviewed medical records of 1,759 women who delivered a singleton infant at a southeast Texas public hospital between November 1, 2012 and June 30, 2014. After excluding women who had inadequate prenatal care or who delivered at <27 weeks gestation, we used multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare 13 outcomes between those who did and did not receive the Tdap vaccine. We examined 6 maternal outcomes (chorioamnionitis, postpartum endometritis, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, induced labor, and mode of delivery) and 7 infant outcomes (low birth weight, very low birth weight, small for gestational age, 5-minute Apgar score, birth defects, and neonatal intensive care unit admission). Maternal Tdap vaccination was associated with decreased odds of cesarean delivery. No associations between maternal Tdap vaccination and infant outcomes were observed. This study demonstrates that Tdap vaccination during pregnancy does not increase the risk of adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

AdultDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousRetrospective StudiesTexasTreatment OutcomeWhooping CoughYoung AdultDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccinesinfant outcomesmaternal outcomespertussispregnancyTdapvaccinationvaccine safety

Identifiers

PMID27002930
PMCPMC4994720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.