ArticlePloS one2016
Psychometric Properties of the Japanese Version of the STarT Back Tool in Patients with Low Back Pain.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Low Back Pain Risk-Stratification Strategy on Patient Outcomes and Care Processes: the MATCH Randomized Trial in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Translation, validation, and reliability of Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire in Nepali.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the STarT back tool for Jordanian Arabic-speaking adults with low back pain.PloS one · 2025Article
- The relationship between the Keele STarT back screening tool, the short form of central sensitivity inventory and health-related quality of life in patients with low back pain.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2022Article
- Changing concepts in approaches to occupational low back pain.Industrial health · 2022Article
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Thai version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in patients with non-specific low back pain.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Does the Keele STarT Back Screening Tool Contribute to Effectiveness in Treatment and Cost and Loss of Follow-Up of the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for Patients with Low Back Pain?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence to improve back pain outcomes and lessons learnt from clinical classification approaches: three systematic reviews.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Review
- Difference between physical therapist estimation and psychological patient-reported outcome measures in patients with low back pain.PloS one · 2020Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the STarT back screening tool in isiZulu.The South African journal of physiotherapy · 2020Article
- Relationship Between Attention Bias and Psychological Index in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Preliminary Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Survey on chronic disabling low back pain among care workers at nursing care facilities: a multicenter collaborative cross-sectional study.Journal of pain research · 2019Article
- Effects of Low-Dose Therapist-Led Self-Exercise Education on the Management of Chronic Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Community-Based, Randomized, 6-Month Parallel-Group Study.Spine surgery and related research · 2019Article
- Psychological Treatment Strategy for Chronic Low Back Pain.Spine surgery and related research · 2019Review
- Development of the Japanese Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI): cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- Estimated risk for chronic pain determined using the generic STarT Back 5-item screening tool.Journal of pain research · 2017Article
- Evaluation of a risk-stratification strategy to improve primary care for low back pain: the MATCH cluster randomized trial protocol.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe STarT Back Tool uses prognostic indicators to classify patients with low back pain into three risk groups to guide early secondary prevention in primary care. The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the tool (STarT-J).
methodsAn online survey was conducted among Japanese patients with low back pain aged 20-64 years. Reliability was assessed by examining the internal consistency of the overall and psychosocial subscales using Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the concurrent validity between the STarT-J total score/psychosocial subscore and standard reference questionnaires. Discriminant validity was evaluated by calculating the area under the curves (AUCs) for the total and psychosocial subscale scores against standard reference cases. Known-groups validity was assessed by examining the relationship between low back pain-related disability and STarT-J scores.
resultsThe analysis included data for 2000 Japanese patients with low back pain; the mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 47.7 (9.3) years, and 54.1% were male. The mean (SD) STarT-J score was 2.2 (2.1). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.75 for the overall scale and 0.66 for the psychosocial subscale. Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.30 to 0.59, demonstrating moderate to strong concurrent validity. The AUCs for the total score ranged from 0.65 to 0.83, mostly demonstrating acceptable discriminative ability. For known-groups validity, participants with more somatic symptoms had higher total scores. Those in higher STarT-J risk groups had experienced more low back pain-related absences.
conclusionsThe overall STarT-J scale was internally consistent and had acceptable concurrent, discriminant, and known-groups validity. The STarT-J can be used with Japanese patients with low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.