Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27002533›Full record

ArticleClinical linguistics & phonetics2016

Volubility of the human infant: Effects of parental interaction (or lack of it).

Suneeti Nathani Iyer, Hailey Denson, Nicole Lazar, D Kimbrough Oller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical linguistics & phonetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From emotional signals to symbols.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Mixed-Language Input and Infant Volubility: Friend or Foe?Bilingualism (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protophones, the precursors to speech, dominate the human infant vocal landscape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. A Six-Minute Measure of Vocalizations in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suneeti Nathani Iyera Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Hailey Densona Department of Communication Sciences and Special Education , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Nicole Lazarb Department of Statistics , University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
D Kimbrough Ollerc School of Communication Sciences and Disorders , University of Memphis , Memphis , TN , USA.
University of Georgia · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Vocal exploration and interaction in the emergence of speechR01DC011027 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OLLER, D. KIMBROUGH · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
Infant vocalization and the foundations for speechR01DC006099 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI OLLER, D. KIMBROUGH · 2004 to 2008
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006099NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although parental volubility, or amount of talk, has received considerable recent attention, infant volubility has received comparatively little attention despite its potential significance for communicative risk status and later linguistic and cognitive outcomes. Volubility of 16 typically developing infants from 2 to 11 months of age was longitudinally investigated in the present study across three social circumstances: parent talking to infant, parent not talking to infant and parent talking to interviewer while the infant was in the room. Results indicated that volubility was least in the Interview circumstance. There were no significant differences in volubility between the parent Talk and No Talk circumstances. Volubility was found to reduce with age. These results suggest that infants vocalise in a variety of circumstances, even when no one talks to or interacts with them. The presence of a stranger or perhaps overhearing adults speaking to each other, however, may significantly reduce infant volubility.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentParent-Child RelationsChild DevelopmentFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsSpeechInfant volubilityparental interviewparental talkparent-infant interactionprelinguistic vocalisation

Identifiers

PMID27002533
PMCPMC4902155
OpenAlexW2333196883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.