Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27002446›Full record

Trial reportJAMA

Effect of Covered Metallic Stents Compared With Plastic Stents on Benign Biliary Stricture Resolution: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Gregory A Coté, Adam Slivka, Paul Tarnasky, Daniel K Mullady, B Joseph Elmunzer, Grace Elta, Evan Fogel, Glen Lehman, Lee McHenry, Joseph Romagnuolo and 7 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01221311 nacompletednot on this map

Use of Fully-covered, Self-expandable Metallic Stents for First-line Treatment of Benign Bile Duct Strictures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of South CarolinaRan2011 to 2016Enrolled112ConditionsCommon Bile Duct StrictureArmsFully covered Metallic Stent, Plastic Stent
NCT06655051 narecruitingnot on this map

Efficacy and Safety of Single Plastic Stent Compared With Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent on Benign Biliary Stricture Secondary to Chronic Pancreatitis: A Single Center,Prospective,Non-inferiority, Open Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2025 to 2030Enrolled134ConditionsChronic Pancreatitis, Benign Biliary StrictureArmsendoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (single plastic stent), endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage ( fully covered self-expanding metal stent)
NCT06981975 completednot on this map

Long-term Outcomes of Different Stents for Benign Biliary Stricture Secondary to Chronic Pancreatitis: A Comparative Study Based on a Large Prospective Cohort

TypeobservationalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled94ConditionsChronic Pancreatitis, Benign Biliary Strictures, Stenting Treatment, ERCPArmssingle plastic stent, Multiple plastic stents, Fully covered self-expanding metal stents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Do We Need to Use a Stent in Biliary Reconstruction to Decrease the Incidence of Biliary Complications in Liver Transplantation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Endoscopic Management of Chronic Pancreatitis].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Gregory A CotéDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis2Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Adam SlivkaDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Paul TarnaskyMethodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Daniel K MulladyDepartment of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
B Joseph ElmunzerDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston6Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Grace EltaDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Evan FogelDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Glen LehmanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Lee McHenryDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Joseph RomagnuoloDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Shyam MenonRoyal Wolverhampton Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Uzma D SiddiquiCenter for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
James WatkinsDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Sheryl LynchDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Cheryl DenskiDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Huiping XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Stuart ShermanDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMethodist Dallas Medical Center · USThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Covered metal stents for treatment of post-liver transplant biliary stricturesR21DK090708 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI COTE, GREGORY A · 2011 to 2012
$427k
NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK090708NIDDK NIH HHS R21DK090708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceEndoscopic placement of multiple plastic stents in parallel is the first-line treatment for most benign biliary strictures; it is possible that fully covered, self-expandable metallic stents (cSEMS) may require fewer endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures (ERCPs) to achieve resolution.

objectiveTo assess whether use of cSEMS is noninferior to plastic stents with respect to stricture resolution. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsMulticenter (8 endoscopic referral centers), open-label, parallel, randomized clinical trial involving patients with treatment-naive, benign biliary strictures (N = 112) due to orthotopic liver transplant (n = 73), chronic pancreatitis (n = 35), or postoperative injury (n = 4), who were enrolled between April 2011 and September 2014 (with follow-up ending October 2015). Patients with a bile duct diameter less than 6 mm and those with an intact gallbladder in whom the cystic duct would be overlapped by a cSEMS were excluded.

interventionsPatients (N = 112) were randomized to receive multiple plastic stents or a single cSEMS, stratified by stricture etiology and with endoscopic reassessment for resolution every 3 months (plastic stents) or every 6 months (cSEMS). Patients were followed up for 12 months after stricture resolution to assess for recurrence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was stricture resolution after no more than 12 months of endoscopic therapy. The sample size was estimated based on the noninferiority of cSEMS to plastic stents, with a noninferiority margin of -15%.

resultsThere were 55 patients in the plastic stent group (mean [SD] age, 57 [11] years; 17 women [31%]) and 57 patients in the cSEMS group (mean [SD] age, 55 [10] years; 19 women [33%]). Compared with plastic stents (41/48, 85.4%), the cSEMS resolution rate was 50 of 54 patients (92.6%), with a rate difference of 7.2% (1-sided 95% CI, -3.0% to ∞; P < .001). Given the prespecified noninferiority margin of -15%, the null hypothesis that cSEMS is less effective than plastic stents was rejected. The mean number of ERCPs to achieve resolution was lower for cSEMS (2.14) vs plastic (3.24; mean difference, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.46; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with benign biliary strictures and a bile duct diameter 6 mm or more in whom the covered metallic stent would not overlap the cystic duct, cSEMS were not inferior to multiple plastic stents after 12 months in achieving stricture resolution. Metallic stents should be considered an appropriate option in patients such as these.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01221311.

Indexed as

StentsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholestasisConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlasticsPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationSample SizeSelf Expandable Metallic StentsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID27002446
PMCPMC5544902
OpenAlexW2311493960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.