Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27001870›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2013

Contribution of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Ismael Diez Del Val, Carlos Loureiro Gonzalez, Santiago Larburu Etxaniz, Julen Barrenetxea Asua, Saioa Leturio Fernandez, Sandra Ruiz Carballo, Eider Etxebarria Beitia, Patricia Perez de Villarreal, Lorena Hierro-Olabarria, Jose Esteban Bilbao Axpe and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ismael Diez Del ValEsophago-gastric Surgery and Robotic Unit, Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain. ismael.diezdelval@osakidetza.net.
Carlos Loureiro GonzalezEsophago-gastric Surgery and Robotic Unit, Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Santiago Larburu EtxanizEsophago-gastric Surgery Unit, Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Donostia University Hospital, Paseo Dr Begiristain, 115, 20080, san sebastian, Spain.
Julen Barrenetxea AsuaEsophago-gastric Surgery and Robotic Unit, Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Saioa Leturio FernandezService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Sandra Ruiz CarballoService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Eider Etxebarria BeitiaService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Patricia Perez de VillarrealService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Lorena Hierro-OlabarriaService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Jose Esteban Bilbao AxpeEsophago-gastric Surgery and Robotic Unit, Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Jaime Jesus Mendez MartinService of General and Digestive Surgery, Basurto University Hospital, Avenida Montevideo, 18, 48013, Bilbao, Spain.
Hospital de Basurto · ESBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted surgery has the advantages of a three-dimensional view, versatility of instruments and better ergonomics. It allows fine dissection and difficult anastomoses in deep fields. Based on our experience, we try to define what are the main contributions of robotics to minimally invasive esophagectomy. From December 2009 to July 2012, we performed 24 minimally invasive esophagectomies (9 transhiatal, 5 Ivor-Lewis and 10 three-field), 16 of them robotically (8, 5 and 3, respectively). Eighteen patients (18/24 = 75 %) received neoadjuvant therapy. Nine patients (9/24 = 37.5 %) had symptomatic complications: 4 anastomotic leaks treated conservatively, one staple failure of the gastric plasty needing reoperation, one biliary peritonitis secondary to a gangrenous cholecystitis, one intrathoracic gastric migration after the only nonresectable case, one chylothorax and one patient with major cardiopulmonary complications. The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 12 ± 7. Median length of stay was 14 ± 13.5 days. Thirty-day mortality was nil. Complications were not related to the robot itself but to the complexity of both the technique and the patient. Although we found no advantages for the use of robotics during threefield minimally invasive esophagectomy, robotic mediastinal dissection during transhiatal esophagectomy can be performed safely under direct vision. Moreover, hand-sewn robotic-assisted technique in the prone position is promising and maybe the simplest way to carry out thoracic anastomosis during Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Indexed as

EsophagectomyEsophagusIvor-LewisMinimally invasive esophagectomyRobotic surgeryTranshiatal esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID27001870
OpenAlexW2052383717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.