Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27001853›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Epigenome confrontation triggers immediate reprogramming of DNA methylation and transposon silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana F1 epihybrids.

Mélanie Rigal, Claude Becker, Thierry Pélissier, Romain Pogorelcnik, Jane Devos, Yoko Ikeda, Detlef Weigel, Olivier Mathieu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
28.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Exploitation of epigenetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The genetic and epigenetic landscape of theScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mélanie RigalLaboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Laboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
Claude BeckerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Thierry PélissierLaboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Laboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
Romain PogorelcnikLaboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Laboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
Jane DevosDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Yoko IkedaLaboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Laboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
Detlef WeigelDepartment of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany weigel@tue.mpg.de olivier.mathieu@univ-bpclermont.fr.
Olivier MathieuLaboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, CNRS, UMR 6293, INSERM U1103, F-63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France; Laboratoire Génétique Reproduction et Développement, Université Clermont Auvergne, Université Blaise Pascal, BP 10448, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; weigel@tue.mpg.de olivier.mathieu@univ-bpclermont.fr.
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology · DEInserm · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRGenetique Reproduction and Developpement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genes and transposons can exist in variable DNA methylation states, with potentially differential transcription. How these epialleles emerge is poorly understood. Here, we show that crossing an Arabidopsis thaliana plant with a hypomethylated genome and a normally methylated WT individual results, already in the F1 generation, in widespread changes in DNA methylation and transcription patterns. Novel nonparental and heritable epialleles arise at many genic loci, including a locus that itself controls DNA methylation patterns, but with most of the changes affecting pericentromeric transposons. Although a subset of transposons show immediate resilencing, a large number display decreased DNA methylation, which is associated with de novo or enhanced transcriptional activation and can translate into transposon mobilization in the progeny. Our findings reveal that the combination of distinct epigenomes can be viewed as an epigenomic shock, which is characterized by a round of epigenetic variation creating novel patterns of gene and TE regulation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDNA Transposable ElementsEpigenesis, GeneticGene SilencingGenome, PlantArabidopsisHybridization, GeneticTranscription, GeneticDNA Transposable ElementsArabidopsisDNA methylationgene silencingtranscriptiontransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID27001853
PMCPMC4833259
OpenAlexW2303263226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.