Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27001804›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Single-dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR Protects Against Human Experimental Infection With Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor.

Wilbur H Chen, Mitchell B Cohen, Beth D Kirkpatrick, Rebecca C Brady, David Galloway, Marc Gurwith, Robert H Hall, Robert A Kessler, Michael Lock, Douglas Haney and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01895855 (A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy Trial of a Single Dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine, PXVX0200 CVD 103-HgR, in Preventing Cholera Following Challenge With Vibrio Cholerae 10 Days or 3 Months After Vaccination), which is not on this map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
18.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01895855 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy Trial of a Single Dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine, PXVX0200 CVD 103-HgR, in Preventing Cholera Following Challenge With Vibrio Cholerae 10 Days or 3 Months After Vaccination

TypeinterventionalSponsorBavarian NordicRan2013 to 2014Enrolled197ConditionsCholeraArmsPXVX0200, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units: Why Support a "Ready Base" of Clinical Trial Sites?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units: A Historical Perspective.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  19. From Yesterday to Tomorrow: How Vaccine Platforms Have Shaped the Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wilbur H ChenCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Mitchell B CohenCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio.
Beth D KirkpatrickVaccine Testing Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington.
Rebecca C BradyCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio.
David GallowayCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio.
Marc GurwithPaxVax, Inc, Menlo Park, California.
Robert H HallNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert A KesslerCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Michael LockPaxVax, Inc, Menlo Park, California.
Douglas HaneyPaxVax, Inc, Menlo Park, California.
Caroline E LyonVaccine Testing Center, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington.
Marcela F PasettiCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Jakub K SimonPaxVax, Inc, Menlo Park, California.
Flora SzaboCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Ohio.
Sharon TennantCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Myron M LevineCenter for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USPaxVax (United States) · USUniversity of Vermont · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION TRAINING GRANTT32DK007727 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Phillip P Minar · 1995 to 2026
$11.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo licensed cholera vaccine is presently available in the United States. Cholera vaccines available in other countries require 2 spaced doses. A single-dose cholera vaccine that can rapidly protect short-notice travelers to high-risk areas and help control explosive outbreaks where logistics render 2-dose immunization regimens impractical would be a major advance.PXVX0200, based on live attenuated Vibrio cholerae O1 classical Inaba vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR, elicits seroconversion of vibriocidal antibodies (a correlate of protection) within 10 days of a single oral dose. We investigated the protection conferred by this vaccine in a human cholera challenge model.

methodsConsenting healthy adult volunteers, 18-45 years old, were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive 1 oral dose of vaccine (approximately 5 × 10(8) colony-forming units [CFU]) or placebo in double-blind fashion. Volunteers ingested approximately 1 × 10(5) CFU of wild-type V. cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba strain N16961 10 days or 3 months after vaccination and were observed on an inpatient research ward for stool output measurement and management of hydration.

resultsThe vaccine was well tolerated, with no difference in adverse event frequency among 95 vaccinees vs 102 placebo recipients. The primary endpoint, moderate (≥3.0 L) to severe (≥5.0 L) diarrheal purge, occurred in 39 of 66 (59.1%) placebo controls but only 2 of 35 (5.7%) vaccinees at 10 days (vaccine efficacy, 90.3%; P < .0001) and 4 of 33 (12.1%) vaccinees at 3 months (vaccine efficacy, 79.5%; P < .0001).

conclusionsThe significant vaccine efficacy documented 10 days and 3 months after 1 oral dose of PXVX0200 supports further development as a single-dose cholera vaccine. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01895855.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialCholeraCholera VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedVibrio cholerae O1Young AdultAntibodies, Bacterialcholera vaccine CVD 103-HgRCholera Vaccineschallengecholeraefficacyvaccinevolunteer

Identifiers

PMID27001804
PMCPMC4872293
OpenAlexW2309663145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.