Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27001563›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016

21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay As a Predictor of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Administration for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of Use, Therapeutic Implications, and Disparity Profile.

Jagar Jasem, Arya Amini, Rachel Rabinovitch, Virginia F Borges, Anthony Elias, Christine M Fisher, Peter Kabos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jagar JasemAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Arya AminiAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Rachel RabinovitchAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Virginia F BorgesAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Anthony EliasAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Christine M FisherAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO.
Peter KabosAll authors: University of Colorado, Aurora, CO peter.kabos@ucdenver.edu.

Funding

Cancer-associated fibroblasts in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.R01CA205044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KABOS, PETER · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Regulation of anti-endocrine resistance of breast cancer by a network of non-codiK08CA164048 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KABOS, PETER · 2012 to 2016
$859k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA164048NCI NIH HHS R01 CA205044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is used to predict disease recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Our study is the first analysis of trends and differences in the use of the RS assay and its impact on recommending chemotherapy in a population-based data set.

methodsPatients with EBC diagnosed from 2004 to 2012 and included in the National Cancer Data Base were analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the covariates associated with use of the test and its impact on chemotherapy decisions.

resultsThe RS assay was ordered for 54.0% of the 143,032 identified patients. Of all the variables, RS assay had the strongest association with recommendation for chemotherapy, with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of 83 for high assay scores. When indicated, test use was significantly associated with younger age, white race, academic centers, private insurance, and pT2/pN0(i+) grade 2 to 3 disease. Black patients (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.43) and those treated in community facilities (AOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.63) were more likely to be tested outside the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Black patients (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.69) and those with high tumor grade (AOR, 30.76; 95% CI, 26.48 to 35.73) had significantly higher assay scores. Younger black patients (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.54) were more likely to receive chemotherapy despite low assay scores.

conclusionThe RS assay significantly influences clinicians' recommendations for chemotherapy in patients with EBC. Black patients tended to have higher assay scores, which may reflect use patterns or less favorable tumor biology for estrogen receptor-positive disease. There are significant differences in use and clinical implications of the test on the basis of race, insurance, and type of facility.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID27001563
PMCPMC4966515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.