Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27001369›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Dose-dependent autophagic effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human HaCaT cells at non-cytotoxic levels.

Viviana R Lopes, Vesa Loitto, Jean-Nicolas Audinot, Narges Bayat, Arno C Gutleb, Susana Cristobal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microrobots for Antibiotic-ResistantACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Cyanophycin modifications for applications in tissue scaffolding.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Effects of carnosine on the embryonic development and TiOFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Smart FeInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Micro- and Nanosized Substances Cause Different Autophagy-Related Responses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Discovery of Benzopyrrolizidines as Promising Antigiardiasic Agents.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Viviana R LopesDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Vesa LoittoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
Jean-Nicolas AudinotMaterial Research & Technology Department (MRT), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Narges BayatDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
Arno C GutlebEnvironmental Research and Innovation (ERIN) Department 41, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LIST), 4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Susana CristobalDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. Susana.Cristobal@liu.se.
Linköping University · SELuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUIkerbasque · ESStockholm University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInteractions between nanoparticles and cells are now the focus of a fast-growing area of research. Though many nanoparticles interact with cells without any acute toxic responses, metal oxide nanoparticles including those composed of titanium dioxide (TiO2-NPs) may disrupt the intracellular process of macroautophagy. Autophagy plays a key role in human health and disease, particularly in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. We herein investigated the in vitro biological effects of TiO2-NPs (18 nm) on autophagy in human keratinocytes (HaCaT) cells at non-cytotoxic levels.

resultsTiO2-NPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and dynamic light scattering techniques. Cellular uptake, as evaluated by TEM and NanoSIMS revealed that NPs internalization led to the formation of autophagosomes. TiO2-NPs treatment did not reduce cell viability of HaCaT cells nor increased oxidative stress. Cellular autophagy was additionally evaluated by confocal microscopy using eGFP-LC3 keratinocytes, western blotting of autophagy marker LC3I/II, immunodetection of p62 and NBR1 proteins, and gene expression of LC3II, p62, NBR1, beclin1 and ATG5 by RT-qPCR. We also confirmed the formation and accumulation of autophagosomes in NPs treated cells with LC3-II upregulation. Based on the lack of degradation of p62 and NBR1 proteins, autophagosomes accumulation at a high dose (25.0 μg/ml) is due to blockage while a low dose (0.16 μg/ml) promoted autophagy. Cellular viability was not affected in either case.

conclusionsThe uptake of TiO2-NPs led to a dose-dependent increase in autophagic effect under non-cytotoxic conditions. Our results suggest dose-dependent autophagic effect over time as a cellular response to TiO2-NPs. Most importantly, these findings suggest that simple toxicity data are not enough to understand the full impact of TiO2-NPs and their effects on cellular pathways or function.

Indexed as

AutophagyCell LineCell SurvivalGene ExpressionHumansKeratinocytesMetal NanoparticlesOxidative StressPhagosomesTitaniumTitaniumtitanium dioxideAutophagyCell-nanoparticle interactionsDoseKeratinocytesTitanium dioxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID27001369
PMCPMC4802894
OpenAlexW2309808671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.