ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2016
Rates of human papillomavirus vaccine uptake amongst girls five years after introduction of statewide mandate in Virginia.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parents' uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines for their children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- A comprehensive review of HPV vaccination policies in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Two decades of the HPV vaccine: its promise, progress, prospects, projections, and posterity.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- Socioeconomic/health-related factors associated with HPV vaccination initiation/completion among females of paediatric age: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Perceptions of a State-Level HPV Vaccine Mandate and Exemption Option in Rural Virginia: A Qualitative Study.Vaccines · 2024Article
- The impact of publicly funded immunization programs on human papillomavirus vaccination in boys and girls: An observational study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2022Article
- School-entry requirements for HPV vaccination: part of the patchwork for HPV-related cancer prevention.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- The impact of school-entry mandates on social inequalities in human papillomavirus vaccination.SSM - population health · 2020Article
- Association Between Human Papillomavirus Vaccination School-Entry Requirements and Vaccination Initiation.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Article
- Article
- The feminization of HPV: How science, politics, economics and gender norms shaped U.S. HPV vaccine implementation.Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2017Article
- Article
- Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Requirements in US Schools: Recommendations for Moving Forward.American journal of public health · 2016Article
- Impact of school vaccination mandates on pediatric vaccination coverage: a systematic review.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Commonwealth of Virginia enacted statewide school-entry human papillomavirus vaccine mandate in 2008 requiring all girls to receive the vaccine before starting the 6th grade. The mandate, one of very few in the country, has been in effect for 5 years. This study assesses the impact that it has had on the rates of human papillomavirus uptake.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the uptake of the human papillomavirus vaccine among girls seeking well-child care 5 years after the introduction of a statewide mandate in Virginia in October 2008. STUDY
designThis prospective cohort study used the Clinical Data Repository at the University of Virginia to identify girls 11-12 years old who was seen for well-child care from January to December 2014. Billing and diagnosis codes were used to establish human papillomavirus vaccine administration. Those girls who were identified through the Clinical Data Repository were then contacted by advance letter followed by a representative from the University of Virginia Center for Survey Research who invited the responsible parent or guardian to complete a 50-item telephone questionnaire. Questionnaire results were used to inform objective findings and to assess parental attitudes that were related to human papillomavirus vaccination. Findings were compared against those of Pierce et al (2013), who evaluated human papillomavirus vaccination levels in a similar cohort of patients in 2008, before mandate enactment, to assess relative change attributable to vaccine mandate.
resultsNine hundred eight girls were identified through the Clinical Data Repository; 50.9% of the girls received at least 1 dose of human papillomavirus vaccine. White race and private insurance coverage were found to be associated negatively with human papillomavirus vaccine uptake (relative risk, 0.74 and 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.85 and 0.62-0.81, respectively). Black race and public insurance coverage were found to be associated positively with vaccine uptake (relative risk, 1.35 and 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.55 and 1.22-1.58, respectively). In comparison with the previous study, there has been no change in human papillomavirus vaccine uptake or distribution of uptake after the introduction of the statewide mandate for human papillomavirus vaccination.
conclusionThe statewide human papillomavirus vaccine mandate has had no impact on the overall rate of human papillomavirus vaccination, nor has it diminished the previously described racial or payer disparities in vaccine uptake in school-aged girls being seen for well-child care in the state of Virginia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.