ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2013
Robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy: initial report and technique.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.Cureus · 2022Review
- Single-Incision versus Multiport Robotic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Surgical Tips.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- A comparison of three approaches for laparoscopic single-site (LESS) myomectomy: conventional, robotic, and hand assisted.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Robotic glove port technique for the endowristed rigid instruments in robotic single-site transabdominal and transvaginal surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2021Article
- Comparison between single-site and multiport robot-assisted myomectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2017Review
- Coaxial robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic applications has recently been described. Such an ultra-minimally invasive technique is attractive to patients and may have clinical advantages because of the reduced number of abdominal incisions. However, because of its extreme geometrical challenges and instrument crowding, single-incision laparoscopy is such a major deviation from optimum surgical ergonomics that it is unlikely to gain popularity. Robot assistance in single-incision laparoscopy has recently been described for some ablative gynecologic procedures, and it seems to have technical advantages. However, no suture-intensive applications of this technique have yet been reported. We describe our initial experience with robot-assisted single-incision laparoscopic myomectomy and provide essential technical detail to enable successful replication of this technique in the context of an advanced robotic surgical team.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27000904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.